La triple legitimación negociadora de los convenios colectivos de empresa: diferencias entre órganos unitarios y secciones sindicales
The following work analyses the application of the legitimacy rules provided for in Articles 87, 88 and 89.3 of the Statute of workers to the non-union and union representatives who can negotiate collective agreements of general application. Previously, the constitutional foundations that enable...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7464726 |
| Source: | Temas laborales: Revista andaluza de trabajo y bienestar social, ISSN 0213-0750, Nº 152, 2020, pags. 139-168 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
The following work analyses the application of the legitimacy rules provided for in
Articles 87, 88 and 89.3 of the Statute of workers to the non-union and union representatives
who can negotiate collective agreements of general application. Previously, the constitutional
foundations that enable each of the two types of workers’ representative bodies are discussed,
thus discerning the different role that the Constitution has for each of them. From this
perspective the next part of the work analyses existing case law on negotiating legitimacy,
separating each of the initial, full and decisive legitimization. Thus, the work highlights the
strict application of the ‘correspondence principle’ when negotiating collectively unitary
representation bodies while, in the case of the unions, the demands of compliance with the
triple bargaining legitimization are interpreted according with the social function that trade
unions fulfill under Article 7 of the Constitution. |
|---|