El derecho de los jueces y el derecho de la administración pública: de la doctrina legal más probable al procedimiento de extensión de la jurisprudencia

From 1887 to the present, in Código de Procedimiento Administrativo y de lo Contencioso Administrativo (2011) –hereinafter CPACA– and the Código General del Proceso (2012) –hereinafter CGP–, the judges say and their projection for future cases Within the judiciary, it has been a problem that faced b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yáñez Meza, Diego Armando
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2019
Subjects:
derecho de los jueces
derecho de la administración pública
jurisprudencia
línea jurisprudencial
derecho sustancial y derecho procesal
law of judges
law of public administration
jurisprudence
jurisprudential line
substantial law and procedural law
direito dos juízes
direito da administração pública
jurisprudência
linha jurisprudencial
direito substancial e direito processual
droit des juges
droit de l’administration publique
ligne jurisprudentielle
droit substantiel et droit procédural
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7295678
Source:Academia & Derecho, ISSN 2539-4983, Nº. 19, 2019, pags. 195-232
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
El derecho de los jueces y el derecho de la administración pública: de la doctrina legal más probable al procedimiento de extensión de la jurisprudencia
Summary: From 1887 to the present, in Código de Procedimiento Administrativo y de lo Contencioso Administrativo (2011) –hereinafter CPACA– and the Código General del Proceso (2012) –hereinafter CGP–, the judges say and their projection for future cases Within the judiciary, it has been a problem that faced by theories –formalism and antiformalism– and, in particular, serious problems for its application. The questions are not unknown in this subject, among others: can the judge create the right in his jurisprudence? Does that say of the judges must be applied in present cases? Is it different to say the judges from the organ producing jurisprudence issue or is there a common denominator in all jurisdictions? Under this context, and based on the same problem, Law has transferred the dissertation to another public power: the judges say and their projection for future cases within the executive branch –in the administrative decision– with which the challenges increase for its applicability. In the present investigation, this legal and doctrinal evolution is described, with important references politics have contributed to sculpt this right, establishing what we believe should be the common denominator for the law of the judges and the law of public administration, combined to the reasons why the applicability of the judges’ sayings has not been full -barriers- within the same judiciary and their treatment now in the seat of the public administration.

Similar Items