O caso Belo Monte: desenvolvimento humano de povos indígenas e tecnopolítica de geração de energia
This case study is divided in four parts. The first part is intended to present Belo Monte Power Plant’s political-institutional background. The second part unfolds the details of the Public Civil Action, filed by the Federal Prosecution Service, which contests the formal and material procedures tha...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7277419 |
| Source: | Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law, ISSN 2179-7943, Vol. 18, Nº. 1, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law [EJJL] | Quadrimestral), pags. 243-276 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001368129
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013681292020-03-13O caso Belo Monte: desenvolvimento humano de povos indígenas e tecnopolítica de geração de energiaFaria Silva, EduardoSantos, Anderson Marcosdireitotecnopolíticadesenvolvimento humanomegaobrasindígenaslawtechnopoliticshuman developmentmegaprojectsindigenous peoplesThis case study is divided in four parts. The first part is intended to present Belo Monte Power Plant’s political-institutional background. The second part unfolds the details of the Public Civil Action, filed by the Federal Prosecution Service, which contests the formal and material procedures that authorized both environmental and affected communities’ hearing anthropological studies, according to the § 3 of Art. 231 of the Federal Constitution. The action was chosen as the object of the present study because it was the first judicial measure having a Supreme Court decision authorizing such studies on the grounds of possible injury to public order and public economy. The third part articulates the content of the decisions given by the judiciary during the procedures of the Public Civil Action, with emphasis to the Constitutional Court’s position on the issue. The fourth part presents technical-juridical considerations that were extracted from the analysis of the documents that composed this study.O presente estudo de caso está dividido em quatro momentos. O primeiro momento destinase à apresentação do histórico político-institucional da Usina de Belo Monte, no Pará. O segundo momento expõe os detalhes da Ação Civil Pública, ajuizada pelo Ministério Público Federal, e que contesta os procedimentos formais e materiais que autorizaram os estudos ambientais e antropológico de oitiva das comunidades afetadas, nos termos do § 3º do art. 231 da Constituição Federal. A ação foi escolhida como objeto de estudo, pois foi a primeira medida judicial que teve uma decisão do Supremo Tribunal Federal autorizando os estudos sob o fundamento de possível lesão à ordem pública e à economia pública. O terceiro momento articula o conteúdo das decisões proferidas pelo Poder Judiciário no trâmite da Ação Civil Pública, com destaque à posição da Corte Constitucional. O quarto momento apresenta considerações técnico-jurídicas que foram extraídas da análise dos documentos que compunham o presente estudo.2017text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7277419(Revista) ISSN 1519-5899(Revista) ISSN 2179-7943Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law, ISSN 2179-7943, Vol. 18, Nº. 1, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law [EJJL] | Quadrimestral), pags. 243-276porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law, ISSN 2179-7943, Vol. 18, Nº. 1, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law [EJJL] | Quadrimestral), pags. 243-276
|
| language |
Portuguese
|
| topic |
direito
tecnopolítica desenvolvimento humano megaobras indígenas law technopolitics human development megaprojects indigenous peoples |
| spellingShingle |
direito
tecnopolítica desenvolvimento humano megaobras indígenas law technopolitics human development megaprojects indigenous peoples Faria Silva, Eduardo Santos, Anderson Marcos O caso Belo Monte: desenvolvimento humano de povos indígenas e tecnopolítica de geração de energia |
| description |
This case study is divided in four parts. The first part is intended to present Belo Monte Power Plant’s political-institutional background. The second part unfolds the details of the Public Civil Action, filed by the Federal Prosecution Service, which contests the formal and material procedures that authorized both environmental and affected communities’ hearing anthropological studies, according to the § 3 of Art. 231 of the Federal Constitution. The action was chosen as the object of the present study because it was the first judicial measure having a Supreme Court decision authorizing such studies on the grounds of possible injury to public order and public economy. The third part articulates the content of the decisions given by the judiciary during the procedures of the Public Civil Action, with emphasis to the Constitutional Court’s position on the issue. The fourth part presents technical-juridical considerations that were extracted from the analysis of the documents that composed this study.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Faria Silva, Eduardo
Santos, Anderson Marcos |
| author_facet |
Faria Silva, Eduardo
Santos, Anderson Marcos |
| author_sort |
Faria Silva, Eduardo
|
| title |
O caso Belo Monte: desenvolvimento humano de povos indígenas e tecnopolítica de geração de energia
|
| title_short |
O caso Belo Monte: desenvolvimento humano de povos indígenas e tecnopolítica de geração de energia
|
| title_full |
O caso Belo Monte: desenvolvimento humano de povos indígenas e tecnopolítica de geração de energia
|
| title_fullStr |
O caso Belo Monte: desenvolvimento humano de povos indígenas e tecnopolítica de geração de energia
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
O caso Belo Monte: desenvolvimento humano de povos indígenas e tecnopolítica de geração de energia
|
| title_sort |
o caso belo monte: desenvolvimento humano de povos indígenas e tecnopolítica de geração de energia
|
| publishDate |
2017
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7277419
|
| _version_ |
1709751502473527296
|