Administrador blindado, juez amordazado: ¿se justifica adoptar la "business judgment rule" en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano?
Director and manager liability is one of the elements that the Corporate Law Reform Project, presented to the Colombian Congress, intended to modify. Bill Number 70/2015 (Chamber of Representatives) planned to import the American business judgment rule. This rule would introduce a more lenient stan...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7249168 |
| Source: | Revista Derecho Privado: (Universidad de los Andes), ISSN 1909-7794, Nº. 55, 2016 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001364712
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Derecho Privado: (Universidad de los Andes), ISSN 1909-7794, Nº. 55, 2016
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
business judgment rule
deferencia al criterio empresarial business judgment doctrine doctrina de la abstención judicial reforma al régimen societario Colombia responsabilidad de administradores sociales sociedades cerradas sociedades abiertas business judgment rule business judgment doctrine corporate law reform Colombia liability of corporate managers and directors close corporations private corporations closely held corporations public corporations open corporations widely held corporations business judgment rule deferência ao critério empresarial business judgment doctrine doutrina da abstenção judicial reforma do regime societário Colômbia responsabilidade de administradores sociais sociedades fechadas sociedades abertas |
| spellingShingle |
business judgment rule
deferencia al criterio empresarial business judgment doctrine doctrina de la abstención judicial reforma al régimen societario Colombia responsabilidad de administradores sociales sociedades cerradas sociedades abiertas business judgment rule business judgment doctrine corporate law reform Colombia liability of corporate managers and directors close corporations private corporations closely held corporations public corporations open corporations widely held corporations business judgment rule deferência ao critério empresarial business judgment doctrine doutrina da abstenção judicial reforma do regime societário Colômbia responsabilidade de administradores sociais sociedades fechadas sociedades abertas Londoño González, Sergio Administrador blindado, juez amordazado: ¿se justifica adoptar la "business judgment rule" en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano? |
| description |
Director and manager liability is one of the elements that the Corporate Law Reform Project, presented to the Colombian
Congress, intended to modify. Bill Number 70/2015 (Chamber of Representatives) planned to import the American business judgment rule. This rule would introduce a more lenient standard of liability for directors and a doctrine of judicial
deference towards business decisions, insofar as certain conditions are met. This article explains the rule’s origin, evolution, scope, shortcomings and justifications in the United States, its country of origin. Furthermore, the article analyses
if transplanting the rule to the Colombian context is justified, and sets forth suggestions that might allow for a successful
importation
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Londoño González, Sergio
|
| author_facet |
Londoño González, Sergio
|
| author_sort |
Londoño González, Sergio
|
| title |
Administrador blindado, juez amordazado: ¿se justifica adoptar la "business judgment rule" en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano?
|
| title_short |
Administrador blindado, juez amordazado: ¿se justifica adoptar la "business judgment rule" en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano?
|
| title_full |
Administrador blindado, juez amordazado: ¿se justifica adoptar la "business judgment rule" en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano?
|
| title_fullStr |
Administrador blindado, juez amordazado: ¿se justifica adoptar la "business judgment rule" en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano?
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Administrador blindado, juez amordazado: ¿se justifica adoptar la "business judgment rule" en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano?
|
| title_sort |
administrador blindado, juez amordazado: ¿se justifica adoptar la "business judgment rule" en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano?
|
| publishDate |
2016
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7249168
|
| _version_ |
1727401212662251520
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013647122022-03-13Administrador blindado, juez amordazado: ¿se justifica adoptar la "business judgment rule" en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano?Londoño González, Sergiobusiness judgment ruledeferencia al criterio empresarialbusiness judgment doctrinedoctrina de la abstención judicialreforma al régimen societarioColombiaresponsabilidad de administradores socialessociedades cerradassociedades abiertasbusiness judgment rulebusiness judgment doctrinecorporate law reformColombialiability of corporate managers and directorsclose corporationsprivate corporationsclosely held corporationspublic corporationsopen corporationswidely held corporationsbusiness judgment ruledeferência ao critério empresarialbusiness judgment doctrinedoutrina da abstenção judicialreforma do regime societárioColômbiaresponsabilidade de administradores sociaissociedades fechadassociedades abertasDirector and manager liability is one of the elements that the Corporate Law Reform Project, presented to the Colombian Congress, intended to modify. Bill Number 70/2015 (Chamber of Representatives) planned to import the American business judgment rule. This rule would introduce a more lenient standard of liability for directors and a doctrine of judicial deference towards business decisions, insofar as certain conditions are met. This article explains the rule’s origin, evolution, scope, shortcomings and justifications in the United States, its country of origin. Furthermore, the article analyses if transplanting the rule to the Colombian context is justified, and sets forth suggestions that might allow for a successful importationO regime de responsabilidade de administradores é um dos aspectos que se pretendiam modificar no projeto de reforma societária que cursava no Congresso colombiano. Particularmente, o Projeto de Lei 70 de 2015 (Câmara) propunha introduzir a business judgment rule, de origem estadunidense. Esta regra estabeleceria padrões de responsabilidade mais laxos para os administradores sociais e proibiria os juízes de revisar suas decisões empresariais, sempre e quando se cumprissem determinadas condições. Neste artigo explico a evolução histórica, o alcance, os debates e as justificações que têm rodeado a business judgment rule nos Estados Unidos, seu país de origem. Adicionalmente, analiso se se justifica sua importação ao contexto colombiano e formulo propostas para um transplante mais bem-sucedido.El régimen de responsabilidad de administradores es uno de los aspectos que se pretendían modificar en el proyecto de reforma societaria que cursaba en el Congreso colombiano. Particularmente, el Proyecto de Ley 70 de 2015 (Cámara) proponía introducir la business judgment rule, de origen estadounidense. Esta regla establecería estándares de responsabilidad más laxos para los administradores sociales y prohibiría a los jueces revisar sus decisiones empresariales, siempre y cuando se cumplieran determinadas condiciones. En este artículo explico la evolución histórica, el alcance, los debates y las justificaciones que han rodeado a la business judgment rule en Estados Unidos, su país de origen. Adicionalmente, analizo si se justifica su importación al contexto colombiano y formulo propuestas para un trasplante más exitoso.2016text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7249168(Revista) ISSN 1909-7794Revista Derecho Privado: (Universidad de los Andes), ISSN 1909-7794, Nº. 55, 2016spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|