Revisitando el concepto de estado en Carl Schmitt. Legalidad, legitimidad y derecho

dialnet-ar-18-ART0001362520

dialnet

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

Jurídicas CUC, ISSN 1692-3030, Vol. 16, Nº. 1, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Jurídicas CUC 2020), pags. 9-38

Spanish

Democracia
Estado
legalidad
legitimidad
parlamentarismo
Schmitt
Democracy
legitimacy
legality
par-liamentarism
Schmitt
State

Democracia
Estado
legalidad
legitimidad
parlamentarismo
Schmitt
Democracy
legitimacy
legality
par-liamentarism
Schmitt
State
Piana, Ricardo Sebastián
Revisitando el concepto de estado en Carl Schmitt. Legalidad, legitimidad y derecho

In this article we will work on the types of state and their legitimacy in the works of the German jurist Carl Schmitt, avoiding falling into a fragmentary reading or loaded with ideological prejudices. The texts will be reviewed, a selection will be made and the main positions held by the author will be presented, following his own exposition. The anthology will be accompanied by an exegesis of the concept of State, its different types and budgets. As the main result, we will notice the problem of legitimacy in the modern State and its link with the political, which liberalism tried to avoid by equating it with the criterion of legality. Schmitt affirms, on the contrary, that legality and legitimacy could even be contradictory and that is why the types of legislative State, the jurisdictional State and the administrative and governmental State are referenced. Finally, the concept of Law, Law and Democracy is confronted. Schmitt's thesis demonstrates the contradictions that exist between the principle of popular sovereignty and the controls fixed to the parliamentary system. The problems he points out have not been overcome either by current theoretical models or by empirical models. Although the possibilities of an "impartial" third party to solve the contradictions left the possibility open to the Führerprinzip, the truth is that the normative tools of exception are still in force in the presidential systems of our Region.

Article

Piana, Ricardo Sebastián

Piana, Ricardo Sebastián

Piana, Ricardo Sebastián

Revisitando el concepto de estado en Carl Schmitt. Legalidad, legitimidad y derecho

Revisitando el concepto de estado en Carl Schmitt. Legalidad, legitimidad y derecho

Revisitando el concepto de estado en Carl Schmitt. Legalidad, legitimidad y derecho

Revisitando el concepto de estado en Carl Schmitt. Legalidad, legitimidad y derecho

Revisitando el concepto de estado en Carl Schmitt. Legalidad, legitimidad y derecho

revisitando el concepto de estado en carl schmitt. legalidad, legitimidad y derecho

2020

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7227793

1709751149646577664

dialnet-ar-18-ART00013625202020-02-07Revisitando el concepto de estado en Carl Schmitt. Legalidad, legitimidad y derechoPiana, Ricardo SebastiánDemocraciaEstadolegalidadlegitimidadparlamentarismoSchmittDemocracylegitimacylegalitypar-liamentarismSchmittStateIn this article we will work on the types of state and their legitimacy in the works of the German jurist Carl Schmitt, avoiding falling into a fragmentary reading or loaded with ideological prejudices. The texts will be reviewed, a selection will be made and the main positions held by the author will be presented, following his own exposition. The anthology will be accompanied by an exegesis of the concept of State, its different types and budgets. As the main result, we will notice the problem of legitimacy in the modern State and its link with the political, which liberalism tried to avoid by equating it with the criterion of legality. Schmitt affirms, on the contrary, that legality and legitimacy could even be contradictory and that is why the types of legislative State, the jurisdictional State and the administrative and governmental State are referenced. Finally, the concept of Law, Law and Democracy is confronted. Schmitt's thesis demonstrates the contradictions that exist between the principle of popular sovereignty and the controls fixed to the parliamentary system. The problems he points out have not been overcome either by current theoretical models or by empirical models. Although the possibilities of an "impartial" third party to solve the contradictions left the possibility open to the Führerprinzip, the truth is that the normative tools of exception are still in force in the presidential systems of our Region.Trabajaremos en el presente artículo los tipos de Estado y sus legitimidades en las obras del jurista alemán Carl Schmitt, evitando caer en una lectura fragmentaria o cargada de prejuicios ideológicos. Se revistarán los textos, realizará una selección y presentarán las principales posiciones sustentadas por el autor, siguiendo su propia exposición. La antología irá acompañada de una exégesis del concepto de Estado, sus distintos tipos y presupuestos. Como principal resultado, advertiremos el problema de la legitimidad en el Estado moderno y su vinculación con lo político, que el liberalismo pretendía soslayar con la equiparación con el criterio de legalidad. Schmitt afirma, por el contrario, que legalidad y legitimidad podían ser, incluso, contradictorios y por ello se referencian los tipos de Estado legislativo, el jurisdiccional y el administrativo y gubernativo. Por último, se confronta el concepto de Derecho, ley y democracia. La tesis de Schmitt demuestra las contradicciones que existe entre el principio de soberanía popular y los controles fijados al sistema parlamentario. Los problemas que señala no han sido superados ni por los actuales modelos teóricos ni por modelos empíricos. Si bien las posibilidades de un tercero “imparcial” que solucione las contradicciones dejó abierta la posibilidad al Führerprinzip, lo cierto es que las herramientas normativas de excepción continúan vigentes en los sistemas presidencialistas de nuestra Región.2020text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7227793(Revista) ISSN 1692-3030Jurídicas CUC, ISSN 1692-3030, Vol. 16, Nº. 1, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Jurídicas CUC 2020), pags. 9-38spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI