Transnational constitutional pluralism, its promises and pitfalls
In today’s world society, constitutional theories converge in assigning an emerging role to legal forms of regulation not bound by national political systems and authorities. Several approaches try to grasp the diversity and multiplicity of layers, levels and stake-holders which constitute the post-...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7216738 |
Source: | Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 41, Nº. 82, 2019, pags. 61-91 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001361711
|
---|---|
record_format |
dialnet
|
spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013617112020-02-01Transnational constitutional pluralism, its promises and pitfallsHolmes, PabloLawState and SocietyGunther TeubnerConstitutional PluralismGlobalizationTransnational Legal OrdersDireitoEstadoSociedadeGunther TeubnerPluralismo constitucionalOrdens jurídicas transnacionaisIn today’s world society, constitutional theories converge in assigning an emerging role to legal forms of regulation not bound by national political systems and authorities. Several approaches try to grasp the diversity and multiplicity of layers, levels and stake-holders which constitute the post-national constellation of regulatory structures. One of the most prominent of these approaches is the idea of a transnational constitutional pluralism. This piece presents theframework of a plurality of transnational constitutional structures as conceived by authors like Gunther Teubner, among others, to critically address the possibility of a global constitutionalization of law based on post-democratic structures in different domains of social regulation. In the end, the piece argues that, although pluralist approaches offer an useful description of current relations between law and power on the transnational level, there are functional limits to the constitutional claim emerging from the pluralist approaches. Such limits are, most importantly, pluralist approaches' incapability of offering democratic mechanisms of legitimization for decision-making processes.Uma miríade de novas teorias constitucionais converge em atribuir um papel emergente para as formas de regulação social não submetidas aos sistemas políticos e autoridades dos Estados nacionais. Diversas abordagens tentam entender a diversidade e a multiplicidade de camadas, níveis e atores que constituem a constelação pós-nacional das estruturas regulatórias. Uma das propostas teóricas mais proeminentes é a ideia de um constitucionalismo pluralista transnacional de Gunther Teubner. Este artigo apresenta a proposta de Teubner e propõe uma crítica do conceito de constitucionalização para além do Estado. Ao final, o artigo argumenta que, embora a abordagem pluralista de Teubner ofereça uma descrição interessante sobre as relações entre poder e direito no nível transnacional, há limites funcionais à sua pretensão de que essas constituições sejam equivalentes e funcionais das constituições políticas.2019text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7216738(Revista) ISSN 2177-7055Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 41, Nº. 82, 2019, pags. 61-91engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
institution |
Dialnet
|
collection |
Dialnet AR
|
source |
Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 41, Nº. 82, 2019, pags. 61-91
|
language |
English
|
topic |
Law
State and Society Gunther Teubner Constitutional Pluralism Globalization Transnational Legal Orders Direito Estado Sociedade Gunther Teubner Pluralismo constitucional Ordens jurídicas transnacionais |
spellingShingle |
Law
State and Society Gunther Teubner Constitutional Pluralism Globalization Transnational Legal Orders Direito Estado Sociedade Gunther Teubner Pluralismo constitucional Ordens jurídicas transnacionais Holmes, Pablo Transnational constitutional pluralism, its promises and pitfalls |
description |
In today’s world society, constitutional theories converge in assigning an emerging role to legal forms of regulation not bound by national political systems and authorities. Several approaches try to grasp the diversity and multiplicity of layers, levels and stake-holders which constitute the post-national constellation of regulatory structures. One of the most prominent of these approaches is the idea of a transnational constitutional pluralism. This piece presents theframework of a plurality of transnational constitutional structures as conceived by authors like Gunther Teubner, among others, to critically address the possibility of a global constitutionalization of law based on post-democratic structures in different domains of social regulation. In the end, the piece argues that, although pluralist approaches offer an useful description of current relations between law and power on the transnational level, there are functional limits to the constitutional claim emerging from the pluralist approaches. Such limits are, most importantly, pluralist approaches' incapability of offering democratic mechanisms of legitimization for decision-making processes.
|
format |
Article
|
author |
Holmes, Pablo
|
author_facet |
Holmes, Pablo
|
author_sort |
Holmes, Pablo
|
title |
Transnational constitutional pluralism, its promises and pitfalls
|
title_short |
Transnational constitutional pluralism, its promises and pitfalls
|
title_full |
Transnational constitutional pluralism, its promises and pitfalls
|
title_fullStr |
Transnational constitutional pluralism, its promises and pitfalls
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Transnational constitutional pluralism, its promises and pitfalls
|
title_sort |
transnational constitutional pluralism, its promises and pitfalls
|
publishDate |
2019
|
url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7216738
|
_version_ |
1709750915918987264
|