Evaluación de desempeño para funcionarios públicos de la rama ejecutiva con nombramiento en provisionalidad como criterio de permanencia en el servicio.
Given the ambiguity on the current legal conditions within the Public System of Employment, it is not quite clear what the assessment for temporary appointed government officials should be like. Such obscurity has caused controversies among judicial criteria, as well as among different regulatory au...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7031689 |
| Source: | Diálogos de saberes: investigaciones y ciencias sociales, ISSN 0124-0021, Nº. 49, 2018, pags. 89-114 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
Given the ambiguity on the current legal conditions within the Public System of Employment, it is not quite clear what the assessment for temporary appointed government officials should be like. Such obscurity has caused controversies among judicial criteria, as well as among different regulatory authorities of public employment. This paper argues that those controversies cause, in turn, uncertainty among those government officials appointed under temporary basis, as well as among those appointing officials in charge of assessing their job performance. However, such uncertainty is not only caused by the regulatory gap, but also because of the implementation of the New Public Management (NPM) approach. Within the present paper, the authors will argue that the aforementioned implementation (NMP) causes some discrepancies when implementing some inherent actions to the public employment management. |
|---|