Lookin’ out my backdoor – The CJEU and the selective acceptance of international tribunals

dialnet-ar-18-ART0001336749

dialnet

dialnet-ar-18-ART00013367492019-08-27Lookin’ out my backdoor – The CJEU and the selective acceptance of international tribunalsCantore, Carlo MariaConstitutional Lawsovereigntyregional or international courtsDerecho ConstitucionalsoberaníaTribunales regionales o internacionalesIn absence of a global political authority, the dialogue between international, supra-national and domestic courts has played a fundamental role over the years in harmonizing regulations among states and promoting the recognition and enforcement of common rights and principles. In Europe, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has been at the centre of this process. Over the years, the CJEU has acted as a “gatekeeper” in the selection of other judges (whether national or international) with which it engages in a meaningful dialogue. The CJEU’s approach has not always been coherent, as opposite outcomes in two recent decisions demonstrate. Recent developments, however, show that the CJEU can reconsider its inclination and show greater openness to the acceptance of other international tribunals.Received: 11 May 2019Accepted: 21 June 2019Published online: 31 July 2019En ausencia de una autoridad política global, el diálogo entre tribunales internacionales, supranacionales y nacionales ha desempeñado un papel fundamental a lo largo de los años para favorecer la armonización jurídica y el reconocimiento y la ejecución de derechos y principios comunes. En Europa, el Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (TJUE) ha estado en el centro de este proceso. A lo largo de los años, el TJUE ha actuado como "guardián" en la selección de otros interlocutores judiciales para el desarrollo de un verdadero dialogo. El enfoque del TJUE no ha sido siempre coherente. Sin embargo, desarrollos recientes muestran que el TJUE  a veces ha reconsiderado su inclinación y mostrado mayor apertura a la aceptación de otros tribunales internacionales.Recibido: 11 mayo 2019Aceptado: 21 junio 2019Publicación en línea: 31 julio 20192019text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7023337(Revista) ISSN 0423-4847Estudios de Deusto: revista de la Universidad de Deusto, ISSN 0423-4847, Vol. 67, Nº. 1, 2019, pags. 41-54engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

Estudios de Deusto: revista de la Universidad de Deusto, ISSN 0423-4847, Vol. 67, Nº. 1, 2019, pags. 41-54

English

Constitutional Law
sovereignty
regional or international courts
Derecho Constitucional
soberanía
Tribunales regionales o internacionales

Constitutional Law
sovereignty
regional or international courts
Derecho Constitucional
soberanía
Tribunales regionales o internacionales
Cantore, Carlo Maria
Lookin’ out my backdoor – The CJEU and the selective acceptance of international tribunals

In absence of a global political authority, the dialogue between international, supra-national and domestic courts has played a fundamental role over the years in harmonizing regulations among states and promoting the recognition and enforcement of common rights and principles. In Europe, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has been at the centre of this process. Over the years, the CJEU has acted as a “gatekeeper” in the selection of other judges (whether national or international) with which it engages in a meaningful dialogue. The CJEU’s approach has not always been coherent, as opposite outcomes in two recent decisions demonstrate. Recent developments, however, show that the CJEU can reconsider its inclination and show greater openness to the acceptance of other international tribunals.Received: 11 May 2019Accepted: 21 June 2019Published online: 31 July 2019

Article

Cantore, Carlo Maria

Cantore, Carlo Maria

Cantore, Carlo Maria

Lookin’ out my backdoor – The CJEU and the selective acceptance of international tribunals

Lookin’ out my backdoor – The CJEU and the selective acceptance of international tribunals

Lookin’ out my backdoor – The CJEU and the selective acceptance of international tribunals

Lookin’ out my backdoor – The CJEU and the selective acceptance of international tribunals

Lookin’ out my backdoor – The CJEU and the selective acceptance of international tribunals

lookin’ out my backdoor – the cjeu and the selective acceptance of international tribunals

2019

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7023337

1709749698450948096