El Bono de desarrollo humano y pobreza multidimensional en Nabón
The Human Development Bond in Ecuador is part of the conditional cash transfers implemented in Latin America since 2000. It is characterized by transferring money to families in extreme poverty, establishing conditionalities and articulating them to other state services. Starts in 1998 in a contex...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2019
|
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7019212 |
| Source: | Killkana sociales: Revista de Investigación Científica, ISSN 2528-8008, Vol. 3, Nº. 1, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista Killkana Sociales), pags. 33-40 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001335766
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Killkana sociales: Revista de Investigación Científica, ISSN 2528-8008, Vol. 3, Nº. 1, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista Killkana Sociales), pags. 33-40
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| description |
The Human Development Bond in Ecuador is part of the conditional cash transfers implemented in Latin America since 2000. It is characterized by transferring money to families in extreme poverty, establishing conditionalities and articulating them to other state services. Starts in 1998 in a context of economic crisis and adjustment of policy, has reforms in the face of current social policy. The research measures the multidimensional poverty of households before and after the Bond, and identifies the privations that contribute to it. The dimensions were constructed in a participatory manner, designating differentiated weights according to the feelings and perceptions of their participants; who also sketched some indicators. With this, 255 surveys are designed and applied by stratified sampling, in a universe of 1012 households; with an error margin ± of 5% and a confidence level of 95%. The applied methodology is based on the Alkire and Foster method; however, it observes the particular objectives of the territory, the program and the validity of social policies. Indicators are identified and refined, grouped and weighted according to deprivation thresholds, appropriate for the local context in 6 dimensions: housing, basic services, education, work / employment, health and organization. The results show improvements in their living conditions. The maximum score of deprivations prior to the bonus is of 35.75 and the minimum of 10.75; whereas now it is 23.5 and 5 respectively. The established quartiles classify households as: Little private, private, very private and extremely private. The greatest amount of deprivation derives from education, basic services and housing. School desertion due to adolescent pregnancy, illiteracy still persists; hence the need to review and direct socials policies.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Barreto Arias, Carmen Raquel
|
| spellingShingle |
Barreto Arias, Carmen Raquel
El Bono de desarrollo humano y pobreza multidimensional en Nabón |
| author_facet |
Barreto Arias, Carmen Raquel
|
| author_sort |
Barreto Arias, Carmen Raquel
|
| title |
El Bono de desarrollo humano y pobreza multidimensional en Nabón
|
| title_short |
El Bono de desarrollo humano y pobreza multidimensional en Nabón
|
| title_full |
El Bono de desarrollo humano y pobreza multidimensional en Nabón
|
| title_fullStr |
El Bono de desarrollo humano y pobreza multidimensional en Nabón
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
El Bono de desarrollo humano y pobreza multidimensional en Nabón
|
| title_sort |
el bono de desarrollo humano y pobreza multidimensional en nabón
|
| publishDate |
2019
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7019212
|
| _version_ |
1709749672253325312
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013357662019-08-20El Bono de desarrollo humano y pobreza multidimensional en NabónBarreto Arias, Carmen Raquel The Human Development Bond in Ecuador is part of the conditional cash transfers implemented in Latin America since 2000. It is characterized by transferring money to families in extreme poverty, establishing conditionalities and articulating them to other state services. Starts in 1998 in a context of economic crisis and adjustment of policy, has reforms in the face of current social policy. The research measures the multidimensional poverty of households before and after the Bond, and identifies the privations that contribute to it. The dimensions were constructed in a participatory manner, designating differentiated weights according to the feelings and perceptions of their participants; who also sketched some indicators. With this, 255 surveys are designed and applied by stratified sampling, in a universe of 1012 households; with an error margin ± of 5% and a confidence level of 95%. The applied methodology is based on the Alkire and Foster method; however, it observes the particular objectives of the territory, the program and the validity of social policies. Indicators are identified and refined, grouped and weighted according to deprivation thresholds, appropriate for the local context in 6 dimensions: housing, basic services, education, work / employment, health and organization. The results show improvements in their living conditions. The maximum score of deprivations prior to the bonus is of 35.75 and the minimum of 10.75; whereas now it is 23.5 and 5 respectively. The established quartiles classify households as: Little private, private, very private and extremely private. The greatest amount of deprivation derives from education, basic services and housing. School desertion due to adolescent pregnancy, illiteracy still persists; hence the need to review and direct socials policies.El Bono de desarrollo humano en Ecuador, es parte de las transferencias monetarias condicionadas implementadas en América Latina desde el 2000. Se caracteriza por transferir dinero a familias en extrema pobreza, establecer condicionalidades y articularlas a otros servicios estatales. Inicia en 1998 en un contexto de crisis económica y política de ajuste, tiene reformas de cara a la política social vigente. La investigación mide la pobreza multidimensional de los hogares antes y después del Bono, e identifica las privaciones que a ella contribuyen. Las dimensiones se construyeron de manera participativa, designándose pesos diferenciados en función del sentir y percepción de sus participantes. Se aplicaron 255 encuestas por muestreo estratificado, en un universo de 1012 hogares; con ± 5% de margen de error y 95% de nivel de confianza. La metodología aplicada, toma como base el método de Alkire y Foster; observa sin embargo los objetivos particulares del territorio, del programa y la vigencia de las políticas sociales. Se identifican y afinan indicadores, se agrupan y ponderan en función de umbrales de privación, propios para el contexto local en 6 dimensiones: vivienda, servicios básicos, educación, trabajo/empleo, salud y organización. Los resultados demuestran mejoras en sus condiciones de vida. El puntaje máximo de privaciones previo al bono es de 35,75 y el mínimo de 10,75; mientras que ahora es de 23,5 y 5 respectivamente. Los cuartiles establecidos clasifican a los hogares en: poco privado, privado, muy privado y extremadamente privado. La mayor cantidad de privaciones derivan a educación, servicios básicos y vivienda. La deserción escolar por embarazo adolescente, el analfabetismo aún persiste; de ahí la necesidad de revisar y direccionar la política social.2019text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7019212(Revista) ISSN 2588-087X(Revista) ISSN 2528-8008Killkana sociales: Revista de Investigación Científica, ISSN 2528-8008, Vol. 3, Nº. 1, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista Killkana Sociales), pags. 33-40spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|