Verso una giurisprudenza ecologica: Il discorso giurisprudenziale sui diritti connessi alla protezione dell’ambiente

dialnet-ar-18-ART0001333634

dialnet

dialnet-ar-18-ART00013336342019-07-31Verso una giurisprudenza ecologica: Il discorso giurisprudenziale sui diritti connessi alla protezione dell’ambienteCiuffoletti, Sofiajudicial borrowingenvironmental rightsjudicial reasoningwild lawinternational human rights courtThe paper presents a comparative analysis of judicial decisions concerning environmental protection, based on the assumption that “unless the environmental rule of law is strengthened, even seemingly rigorous rules are destined to fail and the fundamental human right to a healthy environment will go unfulfilled”. The selection of the relevant jurisprudential contexts is carried out by adopting the point of view of the judicial interaction between international-regional and domestic courts. Based on the idea that, as observed by Slaughter (1996), the courts, on a global level, are "dialoguing" on common themes, borrowing persuasive and strategically useful judicial reasoning from foreign or non-binding interpretative traditions, the paper investigates whether and how this interactive and open-ended argumentative method was used in relevant decisions concerning environmental protection (Burdon, 2013).Starting from the case law of the Indian Supreme Court, we will see how the most prolific regional international courts have oriented themselves in making environmental human rights enforceable and effective, analyzing the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, the African Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.2019text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7010679(Revista) ISSN 1826-8269Jura Gentium: Rivista di filosofia del diritto internazionale e della politica globale, ISSN 1826-8269, Vol. 16, Nº. 1, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: La crisi dei paradigmi e il cambiamento climatico), pags. 183-231itaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

Jura Gentium: Rivista di filosofia del diritto internazionale e della politica globale, ISSN 1826-8269, Vol. 16, Nº. 1, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: La crisi dei paradigmi e il cambiamento climatico), pags. 183-231

Italian

judicial borrowing
environmental rights
judicial reasoning
wild law
international human rights court

judicial borrowing
environmental rights
judicial reasoning
wild law
international human rights court
Ciuffoletti, Sofia
Verso una giurisprudenza ecologica: Il discorso giurisprudenziale sui diritti connessi alla protezione dell’ambiente

The paper presents a comparative analysis of judicial decisions concerning environmental protection, based on the assumption that “unless the environmental rule of law is strengthened, even seemingly rigorous rules are destined to fail and the fundamental human right to a healthy environment will go unfulfilled”. The selection of the relevant jurisprudential contexts is carried out by adopting the point of view of the judicial interaction between international-regional and domestic courts. Based on the idea that, as observed by Slaughter (1996), the courts, on a global level, are "dialoguing" on common themes, borrowing persuasive and strategically useful judicial reasoning from foreign or non-binding interpretative traditions, the paper investigates whether and how this interactive and open-ended argumentative method was used in relevant decisions concerning environmental protection (Burdon, 2013).Starting from the case law of the Indian Supreme Court, we will see how the most prolific regional international courts have oriented themselves in making environmental human rights enforceable and effective, analyzing the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, the African Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

Article

Ciuffoletti, Sofia

Ciuffoletti, Sofia

Ciuffoletti, Sofia

Verso una giurisprudenza ecologica: Il discorso giurisprudenziale sui diritti connessi alla protezione dell’ambiente

Verso una giurisprudenza ecologica: Il discorso giurisprudenziale sui diritti connessi alla protezione dell’ambiente

Verso una giurisprudenza ecologica: Il discorso giurisprudenziale sui diritti connessi alla protezione dell’ambiente

Verso una giurisprudenza ecologica: Il discorso giurisprudenziale sui diritti connessi alla protezione dell’ambiente

Verso una giurisprudenza ecologica: Il discorso giurisprudenziale sui diritti connessi alla protezione dell’ambiente

verso una giurisprudenza ecologica: il discorso giurisprudenziale sui diritti connessi alla protezione dell’ambiente

2019

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=7010679

1709749837163921408