Santi Romano e l’interpretazione giuridica. Appunti per una riflessione sul “metodo” nel diritto pubblico

dialnet-ar-18-ART0001329384

dialnet

dialnet-ar-18-ART00013293842019-07-09Santi Romano e l’interpretazione giuridica. Appunti per una riflessione sul “metodo” nel diritto pubblicoPedrini, FedericoLegal interpretationinstitutionalismSanti Romanoinvoluntary lawlegal theoryThe essay contends the following points: 1) in spite of its openness toward meta-normativity, institutionalism does not imply legal realism; 2) institutionalism does imply a specific theory of the sources of law, in which “involuntary law” has a prominent role; 3) as connected as it may be with interpretation, the theory of the sources of law can be thought of independently from it and, it should be from an analytical point of view; 4) the institutionalist theory of the sources of law leaves some difficulties unsolved, especially concerning the way the theory deals with its own verification and with the valuation of epistemic processes of “discovering” and “creation”. The conclusion is that it is possible to be institutionalist, without giving up a legal and linguistic rigorous account of the process of interpretation, only if it is possible to define which are the other source of law one should refer to unveil relevant legal meanings and with which methods one is expected to approach them.2018text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6897212(Revista) ISSN 1826-8269Jura Gentium: Rivista di filosofia del diritto internazionale e della politica globale, ISSN 1826-8269, Vol. 15, Nº. 2, 2018, pags. 79-113itaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

Jura Gentium: Rivista di filosofia del diritto internazionale e della politica globale, ISSN 1826-8269, Vol. 15, Nº. 2, 2018, pags. 79-113

Italian

Legal interpretation
institutionalism
Santi Romano
involuntary law
legal theory

Legal interpretation
institutionalism
Santi Romano
involuntary law
legal theory
Pedrini, Federico
Santi Romano e l’interpretazione giuridica. Appunti per una riflessione sul “metodo” nel diritto pubblico

The essay contends the following points: 1) in spite of its openness toward meta-normativity, institutionalism does not imply legal realism; 2) institutionalism does imply a specific theory of the sources of law, in which “involuntary law” has a prominent role; 3) as connected as it may be with interpretation, the theory of the sources of law can be thought of independently from it and, it should be from an analytical point of view; 4) the institutionalist theory of the sources of law leaves some difficulties unsolved, especially concerning the way the theory deals with its own verification and with the valuation of epistemic processes of “discovering” and “creation”. The conclusion is that it is possible to be institutionalist, without giving up a legal and linguistic rigorous account of the process of interpretation, only if it is possible to define which are the other source of law one should refer to unveil relevant legal meanings and with which methods one is expected to approach them.

Article

Pedrini, Federico

Pedrini, Federico

Pedrini, Federico

Santi Romano e l’interpretazione giuridica. Appunti per una riflessione sul “metodo” nel diritto pubblico

Santi Romano e l’interpretazione giuridica. Appunti per una riflessione sul “metodo” nel diritto pubblico

Santi Romano e l’interpretazione giuridica. Appunti per una riflessione sul “metodo” nel diritto pubblico

Santi Romano e l’interpretazione giuridica. Appunti per una riflessione sul “metodo” nel diritto pubblico

Santi Romano e l’interpretazione giuridica. Appunti per una riflessione sul “metodo” nel diritto pubblico

santi romano e l’interpretazione giuridica. appunti per una riflessione sul “metodo” nel diritto pubblico

2018

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6897212

1709749599274532864