Los órganos de garantía ante la revisión judicial de su actuación
The bodies that guarantee to have the right of to access to public information, review the express or presumed denials of requests to for access to information, although judges and courts have the final say in case of litigation over the meaning of their resolutions. This article argues for the need...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6957880 |
| Source: | Revista española de la transparencia, ISSN 2444-2607, Nº. 7, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista Española de la Transparencia número 7 (segundo semestre 2018)), pags. 19-28 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
The bodies that guarantee to have the right of to access to public information, review the express or presumed denials of requests to for access to information, although judges and courts have the final say in case of litigation over the meaning of their resolutions.
This article argues for the need to deepen the legal perfection of the processing of claims and the basis of the resolutions of the guarantee bodies, so that in case of litigation, there is no ruling against his position and access to public information can be effectively defended.
In addition, the need to provide uniformity to the jurisdictional body that should review the claims of the guarantee agencies is detected, since nowadays there is a wide dispersion of the competence to know the judicial claims regarding the right of access depending on the legal nature of the body guarantee that dictates them. |
|---|