Religious Diversity: accomodation for Social Cohesion. Gaps in the legal protection of religious diversity: generic versus specific protection instruments
The legal protection of religious diversity in plural societies is mainly supported by the human right to freedom of religion and belief, which is widely recognized under the international human rights law. However, interpretations of this law are far from univocal when it comes to managing the situ...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidad de Deusto = Deustuko Unibertsitatea: Instituto de Derechos Humanos Pedro Arrupe
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3836951 |
| Source: | Anuario de acción humanitaria y derechos humanos = Yearbook of humanitarian action and human rights, ISSN 1885-298X, Nº. 8, 2011, pags. 13-26 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001321913
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013219132019-05-10Religious Diversity: accomodation for Social Cohesion. Gaps in the legal protection of religious diversity: generic versus specific protection instrumentsRuiz Vieytez, Eduardo JavierReligious diversityharmonisation practicesminoritiessocial cohesionDiversidad religiosaprácticas de armonizaciónminoríascohesión socialThe legal protection of religious diversity in plural societies is mainly supported by the human right to freedom of religion and belief, which is widely recognized under the international human rights law. However, interpretations of this law are far from univocal when it comes to managing the situation of persons whose religious beliefs are a minority. The so-called harmonisation practices are techniques to spread the content and exercise of this right. Similarly, the so-called Rights of minorities (as is the case of religious ones) also provide a protection framework, the scope of which has not yet been clearly defined. The current diversity of European societies and their commitment to protect the diversity and minorities lead us to seek a more focused and effective framework of protection, choosing between rights and generic or specific instruments.La protección jurídica de la diversidad religiosa en sociedades plurales se vertebra principalmente sobre el derecho humano a la libertad de religión y creencias, ampliamente reconocido en el marco del Derecho internacional de los derechos humanos. Sin embargo, las interpretaciones de este derecho distan de ser unívocas cuando se trata de gestionar la situación de personas cuyas creencias religiosas son minoritarias. Las llamadas prácticas de armonización constituyen técnicas destinadas a pluralizar el contenido y el ejercicio de este derecho. Paralelamente, el denominado Derecho de las minorías (en su caso, religiosas) ofrece también un marco de protección cuyo alcance no ha sido aún nítidamente definido. La pluralidad actual de las sociedades europeas y su compromiso de proteger la diversidad y a las minorías obligan a buscar un marco más certero y eficaz de protección, optando entre derechos e instrumentos genéricos o específicos.Universidad de Deusto = Deustuko Unibertsitatea: Instituto de Derechos Humanos Pedro Arrupe2011text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3836951(Revista) ISSN 1885-298XAnuario de acción humanitaria y derechos humanos = Yearbook of humanitarian action and human rights, ISSN 1885-298X, Nº. 8, 2011, pags. 13-26engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Anuario de acción humanitaria y derechos humanos = Yearbook of humanitarian action and human rights, ISSN 1885-298X, Nº. 8, 2011, pags. 13-26
|
| language |
English
|
| topic |
Religious diversity
harmonisation practices minorities social cohesion Diversidad religiosa prácticas de armonización minorías cohesión social |
| spellingShingle |
Religious diversity
harmonisation practices minorities social cohesion Diversidad religiosa prácticas de armonización minorías cohesión social Ruiz Vieytez, Eduardo Javier Religious Diversity: accomodation for Social Cohesion. Gaps in the legal protection of religious diversity: generic versus specific protection instruments |
| description |
The legal protection of religious diversity in plural societies is mainly supported by the human right to freedom of religion and belief, which is widely recognized under the international human rights law. However, interpretations of this law are far from univocal when it comes to managing the situation of persons whose religious beliefs are a minority. The so-called harmonisation practices are techniques to spread the content and exercise of this right. Similarly, the so-called Rights of minorities (as is the case of religious ones) also provide a protection framework, the scope of which has not yet been clearly defined. The current diversity of European societies and their commitment to protect the diversity and minorities lead us to seek a more focused and effective framework of protection, choosing between rights and generic or specific instruments.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Ruiz Vieytez, Eduardo Javier
|
| author_facet |
Ruiz Vieytez, Eduardo Javier
|
| author_sort |
Ruiz Vieytez, Eduardo Javier
|
| title |
Religious Diversity: accomodation for Social Cohesion. Gaps in the legal protection of religious diversity: generic versus specific protection instruments
|
| title_short |
Religious Diversity: accomodation for Social Cohesion. Gaps in the legal protection of religious diversity: generic versus specific protection instruments
|
| title_full |
Religious Diversity: accomodation for Social Cohesion. Gaps in the legal protection of religious diversity: generic versus specific protection instruments
|
| title_fullStr |
Religious Diversity: accomodation for Social Cohesion. Gaps in the legal protection of religious diversity: generic versus specific protection instruments
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Religious Diversity: accomodation for Social Cohesion. Gaps in the legal protection of religious diversity: generic versus specific protection instruments
|
| title_sort |
religious diversity: accomodation for social cohesion. gaps in the legal protection of religious diversity: generic versus specific protection instruments
|
| publisher |
Universidad de Deusto = Deustuko Unibertsitatea: Instituto de Derechos Humanos Pedro Arrupe
|
| publishDate |
2011
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3836951
|
| _version_ |
1709749254807879680
|