El primer protocolo adicional del convenio europeo de derechos humanos y el derecho a la seguridad social
The European Convention of Rights does not include in its material scope the right to Social Security. However, since 1996, the European Court of Human Rights has maintained a solid jurisprudential line that recognizes that the right to benefits, contributory and non-contributory is protected as a p...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6869659 |
| Source: | Temas laborales: Revista andaluza de trabajo y bienestar social, ISSN 0213-0750, Nº 145, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: La Jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en materia Laboral. In memoriam José Vida Soria), pags. 371-386 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001318776
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013187762019-03-30El primer protocolo adicional del convenio europeo de derechos humanos y el derecho a la seguridad socialSánchez-Rodas Navarro, CristinaSeguridad SocialPrimer Protocolo AdicionalCEDHTEDHSocial securityFirst Additional ProtocolECRECHRThe European Convention of Rights does not include in its material scope the right to Social Security. However, since 1996, the European Court of Human Rights has maintained a solid jurisprudential line that recognizes that the right to benefits, contributory and non-contributory is protected as a property right under Article 1 of the First Additional Protocol that recognizes every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. Based on this case law, Spain has already been condemned twice. The Court of Justice of the European Union has also assumed that the right to social benefits is a property right in the Florescu case. However, currently, Spanish jurisprudence differs from that held by the European Court of Human Rights and maintains that regarding social security benefits there is no consolidated right but a mere expectation of non-compensable right.El Convenio Europeo de Derechos no recoge en su articulado el derecho a la Seguridad Social. Sin embargo desde 1996 el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos mantiene una sólida línea jurisprudencial que reconoce que el derecho a prestaciones, contributivas y no contributivas es tutelable como derecho de propiedad al amparo del artículo 1 del Primer Protocolo Adicional que reconoce que toda persona física o moral tiene derecho al respeto de sus bienes. En base a dicha jurisprudencia, España ha sido condenada ya en dos ocasiones. También el Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea ha asumido que el derecho a prestaciones sociales es un derecho de propiedad en el caso Florescu. No obstante, hasta la fecha la jurisprudencia española difiere de la sostenida por el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos y mantiene que respecto a las prestaciones de Seguridad Social no existe un derecho sino una mera expectativa de derecho no indemnizable.2018text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6869659(Revista) ISSN 0213-0750Temas laborales: Revista andaluza de trabajo y bienestar social, ISSN 0213-0750, Nº 145, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: La Jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en materia Laboral. In memoriam José Vida Soria), pags. 371-386spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Temas laborales: Revista andaluza de trabajo y bienestar social, ISSN 0213-0750, Nº 145, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: La Jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en materia Laboral. In memoriam José Vida Soria), pags. 371-386
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Seguridad Social
Primer Protocolo Adicional CEDH TEDH Social security First Additional Protocol ECR ECHR |
| spellingShingle |
Seguridad Social
Primer Protocolo Adicional CEDH TEDH Social security First Additional Protocol ECR ECHR Sánchez-Rodas Navarro, Cristina El primer protocolo adicional del convenio europeo de derechos humanos y el derecho a la seguridad social |
| description |
The European Convention of Rights does not include in its material scope the right to Social Security.
However, since 1996, the European Court of Human Rights has maintained a solid jurisprudential
line that recognizes that the right to benefits, contributory and non-contributory is protected
as a property right under Article 1 of the First Additional Protocol that recognizes every natural or
legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. Based on this case law, Spain
has already been condemned twice.
The Court of Justice of the European Union has also assumed that the right to social benefits is a
property right in the Florescu case.
However, currently, Spanish jurisprudence differs from that held by the European Court of Human
Rights and maintains that regarding social security benefits there is no consolidated right but a
mere expectation of non-compensable right.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Sánchez-Rodas Navarro, Cristina
|
| author_facet |
Sánchez-Rodas Navarro, Cristina
|
| author_sort |
Sánchez-Rodas Navarro, Cristina
|
| title |
El primer protocolo adicional del convenio europeo de derechos humanos y el derecho a la seguridad social
|
| title_short |
El primer protocolo adicional del convenio europeo de derechos humanos y el derecho a la seguridad social
|
| title_full |
El primer protocolo adicional del convenio europeo de derechos humanos y el derecho a la seguridad social
|
| title_fullStr |
El primer protocolo adicional del convenio europeo de derechos humanos y el derecho a la seguridad social
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
El primer protocolo adicional del convenio europeo de derechos humanos y el derecho a la seguridad social
|
| title_sort |
el primer protocolo adicional del convenio europeo de derechos humanos y el derecho a la seguridad social
|
| publishDate |
2018
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6869659
|
| _version_ |
1709749277265231872
|