Cimientos, auge y progresivo desuso del control de convencionalidad interno: Veinte interrogantes
ABSTRACT: This article proposes that the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has not configured an univocal concept of conventional internal control. On the contrary, it has proposed several meanings that extend its control subjects, object and control parameter, which makes this construct za “proc...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6816514 |
| Source: | Revista chilena de derecho, ISSN 0716-0747, Vol. 45, Nº. 2, 2018, pags. 337-361 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
ABSTRACT: This article proposes that the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has not configured an univocal concept of conventional internal control. On the contrary, it has proposed several meanings that extend its control subjects, object and control parameter, which makes this construct za “process in works” that generates doubts. In this regard, it identifies, in the jurisprudence of the contentious cases of the last decade, the meanings attributed to the conventional internal control, segmenting three phases or stages of development. Likewise, it recognizes in each of the stages the subjects, parameter and object of the control, verifying if such elements expand or constrict. It also raises a series of questions about the precision and consistency of the meanigin conventional control. |
|---|