Globalização multicultural, direitos universais humanos e socioambientais

dialnet-ar-18-ART0001313132

dialnet

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental, ISSN 2179-8214, Vol. 2, Nº. 1, 2011 (Ejemplar dedicado a: janeiro/junho), pags. 11-39

Portuguese

Direito societário
acordo de quotistas
sociedades limitadas
Globalization
multiculturalism
human rights
social environmental rights

Direito societário
acordo de quotistas
sociedades limitadas
Globalization
multiculturalism
human rights
social environmental rights
Pereira Ramos Júnior, Dempsey
Damas da Silveira, Edson
Globalização multicultural, direitos universais humanos e socioambientais

The globalization process is related to multiculturalism under an european colonial otic, where west hegemonic cultures subjugated peripheric cultures in a clear racism demonstration. The actual globalisation stage that world lives is related more directly to the capitalist model of economy, where the market logic is individualist, patrimonialist and privatist. This same logic contributed to the emergence of the National State, a model of politic organization with an uniforming tendency and vocation of society, based upon an universal concept of rights, where different human communities, porter of different values and own visions of the world, were reunited under the same and uniform order, inside an unique and well defined territory. The globalised market economy favours the contact between different cultures, as much as in and out the same State. The multicultarilism is considered a strategy of peripherics peoples and communities to defend themselves from the uniforming effects of the market economy and its political organism, the National State. There are two globalization: the west hegemonic, conducted by the capitalist economic system; and the counter-hegemonic of the dominated cultures, a reaction against the extermination of local and cultural practices and traditions. The human rights speech is used as hegemonic way pointed toward the capitalist market’s values, and as counter-hegemonic way like minorities reaction. Before such a plural scenario, this text shows some methods of intercultural harmonization, the constitutions, state structures and human rights roles, as such domination instruments, as counter-hegemonic mecanisms.

Article

Pereira Ramos Júnior, Dempsey
Damas da Silveira, Edson

Pereira Ramos Júnior, Dempsey
Damas da Silveira, Edson

Pereira Ramos Júnior, Dempsey

Globalização multicultural, direitos universais humanos e socioambientais

Globalização multicultural, direitos universais humanos e socioambientais

Globalização multicultural, direitos universais humanos e socioambientais

Globalização multicultural, direitos universais humanos e socioambientais

Globalização multicultural, direitos universais humanos e socioambientais

globalização multicultural, direitos universais humanos e socioambientais

2011

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6811079

1709749369431916544

dialnet-ar-18-ART00013131322019-02-20Globalização multicultural, direitos universais humanos e socioambientaisPereira Ramos Júnior, DempseyDamas da Silveira, EdsonDireito societárioacordo de quotistassociedades limitadasGlobalizationmulticulturalismhuman rightssocial environmental rightsThe globalization process is related to multiculturalism under an european colonial otic, where west hegemonic cultures subjugated peripheric cultures in a clear racism demonstration. The actual globalisation stage that world lives is related more directly to the capitalist model of economy, where the market logic is individualist, patrimonialist and privatist. This same logic contributed to the emergence of the National State, a model of politic organization with an uniforming tendency and vocation of society, based upon an universal concept of rights, where different human communities, porter of different values and own visions of the world, were reunited under the same and uniform order, inside an unique and well defined territory. The globalised market economy favours the contact between different cultures, as much as in and out the same State. The multicultarilism is considered a strategy of peripherics peoples and communities to defend themselves from the uniforming effects of the market economy and its political organism, the National State. There are two globalization: the west hegemonic, conducted by the capitalist economic system; and the counter-hegemonic of the dominated cultures, a reaction against the extermination of local and cultural practices and traditions. The human rights speech is used as hegemonic way pointed toward the capitalist market’s values, and as counter-hegemonic way like minorities reaction. Before such a plural scenario, this text shows some methods of intercultural harmonization, the constitutions, state structures and human rights roles, as such domination instruments, as counter-hegemonic mecanisms.O processo de globalização relaciona-se com o multiculturalismo sob uma ótica colonial europeia, em que a cultura hegemônica ocidental subjugou culturas periféricas em uma clara demonstração de racismo. A atual fase de globalização que o mundo vive refere-se mais diretamente ao modelo capitalista de economia, com sua lógica de mercado individualista, patrimonialista, privatista. Essa mesma lógica contribuiu para o surgimento do Estado Nacional, um modelo de organização política com tendência e vocação homogeneizante da sociedade, baseado em uma concepção universal de direitos, em que diferentes comunidades humanas, portadoras de diferentes valores e visões próprias de mundo, foram reunidas sob uma mesma ordem, unitária, em um território único e bem definido. A economia globalizada de mercado favorece o contato entre diferentes culturas, tanto dentro como fora de um mesmo Estado. O multiculturalismo é considerado uma estratégia de povos e comunidades periféricas para se defenderem do efeito homogeneizante da economia de mercado e do seu órgão político, o Estado Nacional. Há duas globalizações: a hegemônica ocidental, levada a cabo pelo sistema econômico capitalista; e a contra-hegemônica, das culturas dominadas, uma reação contra o extermínio de práticas e tradições culturais locais. O discurso dos direitos humanos é usado de forma hegemônica, direcionado para os valores do mercado capitalista, e de forma contra-hegemônica, como reação das minorias. Diante desse quadro plural, o texto mostra alguns métodos de harmonização intercultural, o papel das constituições, das estruturas estatais e dos direitos humanos, quer como instrumentos de dominação, quer como mecanismos de contra-hegemonia.2011text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6811079(Revista) ISSN 2179-345X(Revista) ISSN 2179-8214Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental, ISSN 2179-8214, Vol. 2, Nº. 1, 2011 (Ejemplar dedicado a: janeiro/junho), pags. 11-39porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI