Perfeccionamiento de las instituciones políticas como posibilidad del desarrollo de la persona moral
Rawls’s egalitarian conception has among its objectives to regulate economic and social inequalities, limiting class gaps, poverty and the struggles for covering basic needs. With the argumentative support of justice as Rawlsian equity, we will try to offer strong reasons on (about the following sta...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6808319 |
| Source: | Inciso, ISSN 1794-1598, Vol. 20, Nº. 2, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Inciso), pags. 14-26 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
Rawls’s egalitarian conception has among its objectives to regulate
economic and social inequalities, limiting class gaps, poverty and the
struggles for covering basic needs. With the argumentative support of
justice as Rawlsian equity, we will try to offer strong reasons on (about the
following statement): It would have to be one of the fundamental functions
of the State to guarantee the covering of basic needs that allow a dignified
life to all its co-associates or, in other words, one of the functions of the
State would have to be to guarantee the fundamental social rights of all its
co-associates.
The thesis will be fundamentally based on contractarian theory, since
it is intended to make evident the fundamental role of institutions in the
development of moral persons. In this instance, it is assumed that only
through the State is how citizens can be guaranteed a minimum of well-being
that covers their basic needs and, in that sense, their real and effective
political participation. We dare to affirm that in case of non-compliance:
“the State will have broken the pact”, which in turn would have to involve a
whole series of effects in favor of the co-associates. Precisely, the doctrine
of the social contract, in our modern states, would have to be considered
as one of the strongest argumentative lines in contemporary political
philosophy, and which contributes to confer legitimacy on all social and
legal systems, as well as to delegitimize social structures that do not agree
with a reasonable and fair foundation. |
|---|