Análisis lógico del derecho y pos-positivismo – un Dialogo a partir de las teorías de Alchourron/Bulygin y Atienza/Manero

For Carlos Alchourron and EugenioBulygin, a judicial sentence is justifiableaccording to law only if it contains a logicalsequence of rules and the description of a case.Manuel Atienza and Juan Ruiz Manero deny theapplication of this theory to the legal reasoning.They assert that a different concept...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Almanza Torres, Dennis José
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Análisis Lógico del Derecho
Sistema
Pos-positivismo
Logical analysis of law
System
Post-positivism
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6802843
Source:Seqüência: estudos jurídicos e políticos, ISSN 2177-7055, Vol. 39, Nº. 80, 2018, pags. 31-50
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Análisis lógico del derecho y pos-positivismo – un Dialogo a partir de las teorías de Alchourron/Bulygin y Atienza/Manero
Summary: For Carlos Alchourron and EugenioBulygin, a judicial sentence is justifiableaccording to law only if it contains a logicalsequence of rules and the description of a case.Manuel Atienza and Juan Ruiz Manero deny theapplication of this theory to the legal reasoning.They assert that a different conceptualapparatus is needed that understands law as anactivity where society participates and the juristhas the function of deploying it. This articleexamines and confronts the main theses of theauthors mentioned, emphasizing characters thatshould not be ignored when a judicial decisionis justified.

Similar Items