Justicia después de la guerra
When hostilities reach a conclusion —whether or not they were part of a formal armed conflict—, the parties must be held accountable for their actions. This belief is almost universally held, regardless of one’s moral or ethical convictions. However, the details of this responsibility...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
2016
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6798814 |
| Baliabidea: | DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, Nº. 24, 2016 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001311255
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, Nº. 24, 2016
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
castigo
derecho penal internacional impunidad jus post bellum norma antiimpunidad procedimiento penal internacional punishment international criminal law impunity jus post bellum anti-impunity norm international criminal procedure condenação direito penal internacional impunidade jus post bellum norma anti-impunidade procedimento penal internacional |
| spellingShingle |
castigo
derecho penal internacional impunidad jus post bellum norma antiimpunidad procedimiento penal internacional punishment international criminal law impunity jus post bellum anti-impunity norm international criminal procedure condenação direito penal internacional impunidade jus post bellum norma anti-impunidade procedimento penal internacional Ohlin, Jens David Justicia después de la guerra |
| description |
When hostilities reach a conclusion —whether or not they were part of a formal
armed conflict—, the parties must be held accountable for their actions. This
belief is almost universally held, regardless of one’s moral or ethical convictions.
However, the details of this responsibility are highly controversial and disputed.
In the second section of this short article, a legal basis for post-war justice is pro-
vided that appeals to the anti-impunity norm. It is then concluded that criminal
proceedings uphold the anti-impunity norm better than non-criminal mecha-
nisms. In light of this conclusion, the third section poses the following questions:
How do we achieve post-war justice? Who should be brought to trial: leaders or
soldiers? Should they be tried in national or international courts? What should
they be charged with: national or international crimes? What procedures should
be followed in the trials and how? Finally, why should they be punished?
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Ohlin, Jens David
|
| author_facet |
Ohlin, Jens David
|
| author_sort |
Ohlin, Jens David
|
| title |
Justicia después de la guerra
|
| title_short |
Justicia después de la guerra
|
| title_full |
Justicia después de la guerra
|
| title_fullStr |
Justicia después de la guerra
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Justicia después de la guerra
|
| title_sort |
justicia después de la guerra
|
| publishDate |
2016
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6798814
|
| _version_ |
1727401177731039232
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013112552022-03-13Justicia después de la guerraOhlin, Jens Davidcastigoderecho penal internacionalimpunidadjus post bellumnorma antiimpunidadprocedimiento penal internacionalpunishmentinternational criminal lawimpunityjus post bellumanti-impunity norminternational criminal procedurecondenaçãodireito penal internacionalimpunidadejus post bellumnorma anti-impunidadeprocedimento penal internacionalWhen hostilities reach a conclusion —whether or not they were part of a formal armed conflict—, the parties must be held accountable for their actions. This belief is almost universally held, regardless of one’s moral or ethical convictions. However, the details of this responsibility are highly controversial and disputed. In the second section of this short article, a legal basis for post-war justice is pro- vided that appeals to the anti-impunity norm. It is then concluded that criminal proceedings uphold the anti-impunity norm better than non-criminal mecha- nisms. In light of this conclusion, the third section poses the following questions: How do we achieve post-war justice? Who should be brought to trial: leaders or soldiers? Should they be tried in national or international courts? What should they be charged with: national or international crimes? What procedures should be followed in the trials and how? Finally, why should they be punished?Concluídas as hostilidades, sendo ou não conflitos armados formais, as partes devem prestar contas pelas suas ações. Esse sentimento é quase universalmen- te compartilhado, independentemente da própria estrutura moral ou ética que tiverem, embora os detalhes dessa responsabilidade sejam profundamente con- troversos e discutidos. Na segunda seção deste breve artigo, sugere-se uma base normativa para a justiça depois da guerra que apela para a norma contra a im- punidade. Conclui-se que os processos penais, em oposição aos mecanismos não penais, reivindicam melhor a norma contra a impunidade. À luz dessa conclusão, a terceira seção faz as seguintes perguntas: como devemos alcançar a justiça depois da guerra? Quem deve ser levado a julgamento, líderes ou soldados de infantaria? Em que instâncias devem ser julgados: nos tribunais nacionais ou nos internacionais? Que delitos devem imputar: delitos de tipo nacional ou crimes internacionais? Que procedimentos devem ser seguidos nos tribunais e como? E por que devem ser condenados?Concluidas las hostilidades, ya sean o no conflictos armados forma- les, las partes deben rendir cuentas por su proceder. Este sentimiento es casi universalmente compartido, independientemente de la propia estructura moral o ética que tengan, aunque los detalles de esta res- ponsabilidad son profundamente controversiales y discutidos. En la segunda sección de este breve artículo se ofrece una base normativa para la justicia después de la guerra que apela a la norma contra la impunidad. Se concluye que los procesos penales, en oposición a los mecanismos no penales, reivindican mejor la norma contra la im- punidad. A la luz de esta conclusión, la tercera sección se hace las siguientes preguntas: ¿cómo debemos alcanzar la justicia después de la guerra? ¿Quién debe ser llevado a juicio, líderes o soldados de infantería? ¿En qué instancias deben juzgarlos: en los tribunales nacionales o en los internacionales? ¿Qué delitos se deben imputar: delitos de tipo nacional o crímenes internacionales? ¿Qué procedi- mientos deben seguirse en los juicios y cómo? Y ¿por qué deben ser castigados?2016text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6798814(Revista) ISSN 0124-7255DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, Nº. 24, 2016spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|