Algunas vicisitudes del proceso monitorio en Colombia: una visión desde la academia
Introduction: This article is the result of research carried out by the research incubator of Procedural Law of the Bucaramanga Campus of the Universidad Cooperativa de Colom- bia ( ucc). Methodology : Analysis of certain aspects of the new small claims procedure for declaratory judgment, which...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6798808 |
| Source: | DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, Nº. 24, 2016 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001311249
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, Nº. 24, 2016
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
buena fe
celeridad medida cautelar innominada proceso declarativo monitorio good faith promptness innominate interim measure small claims procedure for declaratory judgment boa-fé celeridade medida cautelar inominada processo declarativo monitório |
| spellingShingle |
buena fe
celeridad medida cautelar innominada proceso declarativo monitorio good faith promptness innominate interim measure small claims procedure for declaratory judgment boa-fé celeridade medida cautelar inominada processo declarativo monitório Tapias Tapias, Amalia Muñoz Sánchez, Rafael Evelio Latorre Merchán, Rafael Ricardo Algunas vicisitudes del proceso monitorio en Colombia: una visión desde la academia |
| description |
Introduction:
This article is the result of research carried out by the research incubator of
Procedural Law of the Bucaramanga Campus of the Universidad Cooperativa de Colom-
bia (
ucc).
Methodology
: Analysis of certain aspects of the new small claims procedure for
declaratory judgment, which the General Procedure Code (cgp by its Spanish initials)
successfully introduced into the legal system. These aspects are related to type, good faith
of the creditor, exhaustion of procedural requirements, and propriety of interim measures.
The analysis was performed pursuant to Articles 419 to 421 and 590 of the cgp
, Law 640 of
2001, Decision C-726 of 2014 of the Constitutional Court of Colombia, and Calamandrei’s
theory on small claims procedure.
Results:
The legislature has shown the same procedural
treatment to both pure and documentary small claims procedure, contrary to Calaman-
drei’s theory; the admission of pure small claims procedure implies that the judge supports
the requirement of good faith payment to the creditor. In accordance with the norms on
pre-trial conciliation, to initiate a small claims procedure classified as special declaratory,
the plaintiff must prove compliance with the procedural requirements, that is, provide
proof of having exhausted the attempt at conciliation. However, the plaintiff may substitute
this with the request for and, logically, with the propriety of an interim measure, for which
security must be furnished.
Conclusions
: In small claims procedure, the plaintiff must pro-
vide proof of having exhausted procedural requirements. Finding an innominate measure
in the context of small claims procedure with a view to guaranteeing the effectiveness of
the right to credence will be a difficult task.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Tapias Tapias, Amalia
Muñoz Sánchez, Rafael Evelio Latorre Merchán, Rafael Ricardo |
| author_facet |
Tapias Tapias, Amalia
Muñoz Sánchez, Rafael Evelio Latorre Merchán, Rafael Ricardo |
| author_sort |
Tapias Tapias, Amalia
|
| title |
Algunas vicisitudes del proceso monitorio en Colombia: una visión desde la academia
|
| title_short |
Algunas vicisitudes del proceso monitorio en Colombia: una visión desde la academia
|
| title_full |
Algunas vicisitudes del proceso monitorio en Colombia: una visión desde la academia
|
| title_fullStr |
Algunas vicisitudes del proceso monitorio en Colombia: una visión desde la academia
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Algunas vicisitudes del proceso monitorio en Colombia: una visión desde la academia
|
| title_sort |
algunas vicisitudes del proceso monitorio en colombia: una visión desde la academia
|
| publishDate |
2016
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6798808
|
| _version_ |
1727401176507351040
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013112492022-03-13Algunas vicisitudes del proceso monitorio en Colombia: una visión desde la academiaTapias Tapias, AmaliaMuñoz Sánchez, Rafael EvelioLatorre Merchán, Rafael Ricardobuena feceleridadmedida cautelar innominadaproceso declarativo monitoriogood faithpromptnessinnominate interim measuresmall claims procedure for declaratory judgmentboa-féceleridademedida cautelar inominadaprocesso declarativo monitórioIntroduction: This article is the result of research carried out by the research incubator of Procedural Law of the Bucaramanga Campus of the Universidad Cooperativa de Colom- bia ( ucc). Methodology : Analysis of certain aspects of the new small claims procedure for declaratory judgment, which the General Procedure Code (cgp by its Spanish initials) successfully introduced into the legal system. These aspects are related to type, good faith of the creditor, exhaustion of procedural requirements, and propriety of interim measures. The analysis was performed pursuant to Articles 419 to 421 and 590 of the cgp , Law 640 of 2001, Decision C-726 of 2014 of the Constitutional Court of Colombia, and Calamandrei’s theory on small claims procedure. Results: The legislature has shown the same procedural treatment to both pure and documentary small claims procedure, contrary to Calaman- drei’s theory; the admission of pure small claims procedure implies that the judge supports the requirement of good faith payment to the creditor. In accordance with the norms on pre-trial conciliation, to initiate a small claims procedure classified as special declaratory, the plaintiff must prove compliance with the procedural requirements, that is, provide proof of having exhausted the attempt at conciliation. However, the plaintiff may substitute this with the request for and, logically, with the propriety of an interim measure, for which security must be furnished. Conclusions : In small claims procedure, the plaintiff must pro- vide proof of having exhausted procedural requirements. Finding an innominate measure in the context of small claims procedure with a view to guaranteeing the effectiveness of the right to credence will be a difficult task.Introdução: resultado da pesquisa desenvolvida pelo grupo de pesquisa de Direito Pro- cessual da Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia (ucc), sede Bucaramanga. Metodologia : analisar algumas vicissitudes do novo processo declarativo monitório, o qual, em tempo oportuno, introduziu o Código Geral do Processo (cgp) ao ordenamento jurídico. Essas vicissitudes estão relacionadas com a tipologia, com a boa-fé do credor, com o exaurimen- to do requisito de procedibilidade e com a procedência de medidas cautelares. A análise realiza-se com fundamentos nos artigos 419 ao 421 e 590 do c g p, a Lei 640 de 2001, a Sentença C-726 de 2014 da Corte Constitucional e a teoria de Calamandrei acerca do pro- cesso monitório. Resultados: o legislador deu o mesmo tratamento processual ao processo monitório puro e ao documental, ao contrário da teoria de Calamandrei; a admissão do processo monitório puro implica que o juiz apoie o requerimento de pagamento na boa-fé do credor. Segundo as normas relativas à conciliação pré-processual, para iniciar um pro- cesso monitório, classificado como declarativo especial, o requerente deverá comprovar o cumprimento do requisito de procedibilidade, isso é, provar ter exaurido a tentativa de conciliação. No entanto, poderá complementar com a solicitação e logicamente com a procedência de uma medida cautelar, para o qual terá que prestar caução. Conclusões : no processo monitório, o requerente deve provar o exaurimento do requisito de procedi- bilidade. Encontrar uma medida inominada no contexto do processo monitório, a fim de garantir a efetividade do direito ao crédito, será uma árdua tarefa.Introducción: resultado de la investigación desarrollada por el semillero de Derecho Procesal de la Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia (ucc), sede Bucaramanga. Metodología: analizar algunas vicisitudes del nuevo proceso declarativo monitorio, el cual, en hora buena,introdujo el Código General del Proceso (cgp) al ordenamiento jurídico. Estas vicisitudes están relacionadas con la tipología, la buena fe del acreedor, el agotamiento del requisito de procedibilidad y la procedencia de medidas cautelares. El análisis se realiza con fundamentos en los artículos 419 al 421 y 590 del cgp, la Ley 640 del 2001, la Sentencia C-726 de 2014 de la Corte Constitucional y la teoría de Calamandrei acerca del proceso monitorio. Resultados: el legislador le ha dado el mismo tratamiento procesal al proceso monitorio puro y al documental, contrario a la teoría de Calamandrei; la admisión delproceso monitorio puro implica que el juez apoye el requerimiento de pago en la buena fe del acreedor. Al tenor de las normas relativas a la conciliación pre-procesal, para iniciar un proceso monitorio, clasifiado como declarativo especial, el demandante deberá acreditar el cumplimiento del requisito de procedibilidad, esto es, aportar prueba de haber agotado el intento de conciliación. No obstante, podrá suplirlo con la solicitud y lógicamente con la procedencia de una medida cautelar, para lo cual tendrá que prestar caución. Conclusiones: en el proceso monitorio, el demandante debe aportar prueba del agotamiento del requisito de procedibilidad. Encontrar una medida innominada en el contexto del proceso monitorio, en aras de garantizar la efectividad del derecho al crédito, será una ardua tarea.2016text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6798808(Revista) ISSN 0124-7255DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, Nº. 24, 2016spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|