Principio de legalidad y prevaricato

dialnet-ar-18-ART0001311248

dialnet

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, Nº. 24, 2016

Spanish

civil law
common law
precedente judicial
prevaricato
civil law
common law
judicial precedent
malfeasance
civil law
common law
precedente judicial
prevaricação

civil law
common law
precedente judicial
prevaricato
civil law
common law
judicial precedent
malfeasance
civil law
common law
precedente judicial
prevaricação
López Quiróz, Alexander
Principio de legalidad y prevaricato

Purpose : To determine if malfeasance is possible when what has been called judicial precedent by the Constitutional Court of Colombia is not abided by. Methodology : This article analyzes the existing norms of judicial precedent and, on this basis, whether it is lawful to try a public servant for malfeasance for de- parting from the doctrine of the high courts. Viewpoint : Judicial precedent, or judicial legislation, is not legitimate law in Colombia; therefore, no malfeasance is committed when a judge departs from the rulings of the high courts. Conclu - sions : According to the principle of legality and through induction, it is possible to demonstrate that the Constitutional Court lacks the functional competence to legislate, and its doing so constitutes malfeasance. Failure to give binding force to the doctrine of the high courts does not constitute malfeasance, as has been affirmed by the Constitutional Court of Colombia.

Article

López Quiróz, Alexander

López Quiróz, Alexander

López Quiróz, Alexander

Principio de legalidad y prevaricato

Principio de legalidad y prevaricato

Principio de legalidad y prevaricato

Principio de legalidad y prevaricato

Principio de legalidad y prevaricato

principio de legalidad y prevaricato

2016

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6798807

1727401176315461632

dialnet-ar-18-ART00013112482022-03-13Principio de legalidad y prevaricatoLópez Quiróz, Alexandercivil lawcommon lawprecedente judicialprevaricatocivil lawcommon lawjudicial precedentmalfeasancecivil lawcommon lawprecedente judicialprevaricaçãoPurpose : To determine if malfeasance is possible when what has been called judicial precedent by the Constitutional Court of Colombia is not abided by. Methodology : This article analyzes the existing norms of judicial precedent and, on this basis, whether it is lawful to try a public servant for malfeasance for de- parting from the doctrine of the high courts. Viewpoint : Judicial precedent, or judicial legislation, is not legitimate law in Colombia; therefore, no malfeasance is committed when a judge departs from the rulings of the high courts. Conclu - sions : According to the principle of legality and through induction, it is possible to demonstrate that the Constitutional Court lacks the functional competence to legislate, and its doing so constitutes malfeasance. Failure to give binding force to the doctrine of the high courts does not constitute malfeasance, as has been affirmed by the Constitutional Court of Colombia.Propósito: determinar se a prevaricação é possível, ao não atacar o que se denomi- nou como “precedente judicial” pela Corte Constitucional. Descrição : analisa-se a existência normativa do precedente judicial e, sobre essa base, se for procedente julgar por prevaricação a um servidor público por afastar-se da doutrina das altas cortes. Ponto de vista : o precedente judicial ou legislação judicial não é lei legítima na Colômbia, não existe a prevaricação quando o juiz se afasta das sentenças das altas cortes. Conclusões : a partir do princípio de legalidade e por meio da indu- ção, consegue-se demonstrar que a Corte Constitucional carece de competência funcional para legislar, e ao fazê-lo prevarica. O fato de não dar poder vinculante à doutrina das altas cortes não se constitui prevaricação, como afirmou a Corte Constitucional colombiana.Propósito : determinar si el prevaricato es posible, al no acatar lo que se ha denominado “precedente judicial” por la Corte Constitucional. Descripción : se analiza la existencia normativa del precedente judicial y, sobre esta base, si es procedente juzgar por prevaricato a un servidor público por alejarse de la doctrina de las altas cortes. Punto de vista : el precedente judicial o legislación judicial no es ley legítima en Colom- bia, no existe el prevaricato cuando un juez se aleja de las sentencias de las altas cortes. Conclusiones: desde el principio de legalidad y a través de la inducción, se logra demostrar que la Corte Constitucional carece de la competencia funcional para legislar, y al hacerlo, preva- rica. El hecho de no darle poder vinculante a la doctrina de las altas cortes no se constituye en prevaricato, como lo ha afirmado la Corte Constitucional colombiana.2016text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6798807(Revista) ISSN 0124-7255DIXI, ISSN 0124-7255, Nº. 24, 2016spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI