Abandonos forzados y despojos de tierras en el sur de Colombia: El caso de Neiva-Huila. 2002-2017
With the failure of the peace process between the government of Andrés Pastrana and the guerrilla of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) at the beginning of 2002, the national policy of the Democratic Security of the government of Álvaro Uribe Vélez was established, which increased the...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Idioma: | Castellano |
| Publicado: |
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6759620 |
| Fuente: | Estudios de derecho, ISSN 0120-1867, Vol. 75, Nº. 166, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Democracia y Corrupción), pags. 77-94 |
| Etiquetas: |
Añadir etiqueta
Sin etiquetas: Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001310825
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Estudios de derecho, ISSN 0120-1867, Vol. 75, Nº. 166, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Democracia y Corrupción), pags. 77-94
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
despojo de tierras
conflicto armado en Colombia violencia procesos de paz Fuerzas Armadas de Colombia población civil Neiva Huila Abandono forçado desapossamento de terras conflito armado na Colômbia violência processos de paz Abandono forzado Forças Armadas da Colômbia população civil Neiva Huila Forced abandonment land dispossession armed conflict in Colombia violence peace processes armed Forces of Colombia civil population Neiva Huila |
| spellingShingle |
despojo de tierras
conflicto armado en Colombia violencia procesos de paz Fuerzas Armadas de Colombia población civil Neiva Huila Abandono forçado desapossamento de terras conflito armado na Colômbia violência processos de paz Abandono forzado Forças Armadas da Colômbia população civil Neiva Huila Forced abandonment land dispossession armed conflict in Colombia violence peace processes armed Forces of Colombia civil population Neiva Huila Caicedo Frayde, Eder Barragan Ronderos, Daniel Abandonos forzados y despojos de tierras en el sur de Colombia: El caso de Neiva-Huila. 2002-2017 |
| description |
With the failure of the peace process between the government of Andrés Pastrana and the guerrilla of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) at the beginning of 2002, the national policy of the Democratic Security of the government of Álvaro Uribe Vélez was established, which increased the military and intelligence presence of the armed forces in various regions of the country. Neiva, capital of the department of Huila, became a zone of escalation of the war that until a few years ago suffered the constant inclemency of the attacks of actors of the armed conflict. The article analyzes the impacts of the armed conflict in the “opita” society, emphasizing the dynamics of dispossession and forced abandonment of land between 2002 and 2017. It also highlights the guerrilla incursions in the city of Neiva, and the abuse that the guerrillas of the FARC recognized to have perpetrated against the civilian population in the framework of the escalation of armed actions and war. The main means of communication and their constant denunciation of the increase in violence and coercion against the civilian population were used as sources, as well as reports from the Office of the Attorney General of the Nation, among other entities of the State. There was also a general description of the specialized historiography of the period of negotiations between the government of Andres Pastrana and the FARC, which served as a basis for interpreting the logics of forced abandonment and dispossession of land in the south of the country.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Caicedo Frayde, Eder
Barragan Ronderos, Daniel |
| author_facet |
Caicedo Frayde, Eder
Barragan Ronderos, Daniel |
| author_sort |
Caicedo Frayde, Eder
|
| title |
Abandonos forzados y despojos de tierras en el sur de Colombia: El caso de Neiva-Huila. 2002-2017
|
| title_short |
Abandonos forzados y despojos de tierras en el sur de Colombia: El caso de Neiva-Huila. 2002-2017
|
| title_full |
Abandonos forzados y despojos de tierras en el sur de Colombia: El caso de Neiva-Huila. 2002-2017
|
| title_fullStr |
Abandonos forzados y despojos de tierras en el sur de Colombia: El caso de Neiva-Huila. 2002-2017
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Abandonos forzados y despojos de tierras en el sur de Colombia: El caso de Neiva-Huila. 2002-2017
|
| title_sort |
abandonos forzados y despojos de tierras en el sur de colombia: el caso de neiva-huila. 2002-2017
|
| publishDate |
2018
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6759620
|
| _version_ |
1709748745927655424
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00013108252019-03-02Abandonos forzados y despojos de tierras en el sur de Colombia: El caso de Neiva-Huila. 2002-2017Caicedo Frayde, EderBarragan Ronderos, Danieldespojo de tierrasconflicto armado en Colombiaviolenciaprocesos de pazFuerzas Armadas de Colombiapoblación civilNeivaHuilaAbandono forçadodesapossamento de terrasconflito armado na Colômbiaviolênciaprocessos de pazAbandono forzadoForças Armadas da Colômbiapopulação civilNeivaHuilaForced abandonmentland dispossessionarmed conflict in Colombiaviolencepeace processesarmed Forces of Colombiacivil populationNeivaHuilaWith the failure of the peace process between the government of Andrés Pastrana and the guerrilla of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) at the beginning of 2002, the national policy of the Democratic Security of the government of Álvaro Uribe Vélez was established, which increased the military and intelligence presence of the armed forces in various regions of the country. Neiva, capital of the department of Huila, became a zone of escalation of the war that until a few years ago suffered the constant inclemency of the attacks of actors of the armed conflict. The article analyzes the impacts of the armed conflict in the “opita” society, emphasizing the dynamics of dispossession and forced abandonment of land between 2002 and 2017. It also highlights the guerrilla incursions in the city of Neiva, and the abuse that the guerrillas of the FARC recognized to have perpetrated against the civilian population in the framework of the escalation of armed actions and war. The main means of communication and their constant denunciation of the increase in violence and coercion against the civilian population were used as sources, as well as reports from the Office of the Attorney General of the Nation, among other entities of the State. There was also a general description of the specialized historiography of the period of negotiations between the government of Andres Pastrana and the FARC, which served as a basis for interpreting the logics of forced abandonment and dispossession of land in the south of the country.Após o fracasso do processo de paz entre o governo de Andrés Pastrana e a guerrilha das Forças Armadas Revolucionárias da Colômbia (FARC) no início do ano de 2002, foi criada a política nacional da Segurança Democrática do governo de Álvaro Uribe Vélez que aumentou a presença militar e de inteligência das forças armadas em várias regiões do país. Neiva, capital do estado de Huila, tornou-se uma zona de escalada da guerra que até poucos anos sofreu a constante inclemência dos ataques de atores do conflito armado. É desta maneira que este artigo analisa os impactos do conflito armado na sociedade Huilense, fazendo ênfase nas dinâmicas de desapossamento e abandonos forçados de terras entre 2002 e 2017. Também se destacam as incursões da guerrilha na cidade de Neiva - Huila e o maltrato que os mesmos guerrilheiros das FARC reconheceram ter cometido contra a população civil dentro da escalada das ações armadas e da guerra sem tréguas. Os principais meios de comunicação e a sua constante denúncia do aumento da violência e da coação contra a população civil foram utilizados como fontes, bem como os relatórios da Procuradoria Geral da Nação, entre outros órgãos do Estado. Fez-se, também, uma descrição geral da historiografia especializada do período das negociações entre o governo de Andrés Pastrana e as FARC, a qual foi utilizada para interpretar as lógicas de abandono forçado e desapossamento no sul do país.Posterior al fracaso del proceso de paz entre el gobierno de Andrés Pastrana y la guerrilla de las Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC) a inicios de 2002, se instauró la política nacional de la Seguridad Democrática del gobierno de Álvaro Uribe Vélez que incrementó la presencia militar y de inteligencia de las fuerzas armadas en varias regiones del país. Neiva, capital del departamento del Huila, se convirtió en una zona de escalamiento de la guerra que hasta hace pocos años sufrió la constante inclemencia de los ataques de actores del conflicto armado. El presente artículo analiza los impactos del conflicto armado en la sociedad opita, haciendo énfasis en las dinámicas de despojos y abandonos forzados de tierras entre 2002 y 2017. También se destacan las incursiones guerrilleras en la ciudad de Neiva – Huila y el maltrato que los mismos guerrilleros de las FARC reconocieron haber perpetrado contra la población civil en el marco del escalamiento de las acciones armadas y de guerra sin cuartel. Los principales medios de comunicación y su constante denuncia del aumento de la violencia y la coacción contra la población civil se utilizaron como fuentes, así como los informes de la Procuraduría General de la Nación, entre otras entidades del Estado. También se hizo una descripción general de la historiografía especializada del periodo de las negociaciones entre el gobierno de Andrés Pastrana y las FARC, la cual sirvió como asidero para interpretar las lógicas de abandono forzado y despojo en el sur del país.2018text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6759620(Revista) ISSN 0120-1867Estudios de derecho, ISSN 0120-1867, Vol. 75, Nº. 166, 2018 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Democracia y Corrupción), pags. 77-94spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|