Limites aos direitos de proteçao incidentes sobre os cultivares: Cultivar no Brasil tem corpo fechado contra encosto, olho gordo, patentes e outras mandingas
For we guide our study and better identify the main elements and if the arguments, as well as the exposed positions along the action, which the judgment mentioned part, we set out below a summary of the lawsuit. Therefore, we use the resume that part of the court judgment of 1st degree, given by Dr....
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6747781 |
| Source: | PIDCC: Revista em propriedade intelectual direito contêmporaneo, ISSN 2316-8080, Vol. 10, Nº. 2, 2016, pags. 19-90 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
For we guide our study and better identify the main elements and if the arguments, as well as the exposed positions along the action, which the judgment mentioned part, we set out below a summary of the lawsuit. Therefore, we use the resume that part of the court judgment of 1st degree, given by Dr. Giovanni Conti Judge, referring to action n. 001 / 1.09.0106915-2, and underway before the 15th Civil Court of Porto Alegre County Justice Court of Rio Grande do Sul and the entire content of the excerpts Civil Appeal No. 70049447253, delivered by the Court of the 5th Civil Chamber Justice of Rio Grande do Sul, in which parts are the Rural Union of Passo Fundo-RS and others Authors of this lawsuit and appealed in the appeal, and Monsanto do Brazil Ltda. Monsanto and Techonology LLC, ground into action and Appellants on appeal. |
|---|