Proposiçoes doutrinárias e jurisprudenciais sobre o patenteamento do material genético humano
The present work analyzes the light of domestic and international law issues about patenting human genetic material using as reference the jurisprudential Case Oliver Brüstle x Greenpeace. For this purpose make a comparative analysis between the intellectual property laws of some countries in Latin...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6719811 |
| Source: | PIDCC: Revista em propriedade intelectual direito contêmporaneo, ISSN 2316-8080, Nº. 6, 2014, pags. 64-96 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
The present work analyzes the light of domestic and international law issues about patenting human genetic material using as reference the jurisprudential Case Oliver Brüstle x Greenpeace. For this purpose make a comparative analysis between the intellectual property laws of some countries in Latin America, as well as the specifics of the Biotechnology Directive 44/98 and then the following relevant to the proposed topics: Case v. Oliver Brüstle. Greenpeace, facts and questions of Case, Article 27 of TRIPS, Directive 44/98, the peculiarities of Articles 10 and 18 of Law 9.279/96, the intrinsic requirements of patents in optics of Law 9.279/96 and Policy 44/98. |
|---|