La fuerza vinculante de la jurisprudencia del Consejo de Estado

Constitutional jurisprudence is considered a formal and material source of law in the Colombian legal system, hence its binding force in the decisions of judicial and administrative authorities. This recognition, derived from the judicial function of the Constitutional Court, does not occur in the c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vargas Florián, Sandra Mercedes
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2018
Subjects:
law
ley
lei
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6685101
Source:IUSTA, ISSN 1900-0448, Vol. 1, Nº. 48, 2018, pags. 119-144
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001298329
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
IUSTA, ISSN 1900-0448, Vol. 1, Nº. 48, 2018, pags. 119-144
language
Spanish
topic
jurisprudence
law
precedent
binding force
judicial arbitration
judge
administration
jurisprudencia
ley
precedente
fuerza vinculante
arbitrio judicial
juez
administración
jurisprudência
lei
precedente
força vinculante
arbítrio judicial
juiz
administração
spellingShingle
jurisprudence
law
precedent
binding force
judicial arbitration
judge
administration
jurisprudencia
ley
precedente
fuerza vinculante
arbitrio judicial
juez
administración
jurisprudência
lei
precedente
força vinculante
arbítrio judicial
juiz
administração
Vargas Florián, Sandra Mercedes
La fuerza vinculante de la jurisprudencia del Consejo de Estado
description
Constitutional jurisprudence is considered a formal and material source of law in the Colombian legal system, hence its binding force in the decisions of judicial and administrative authorities. This recognition, derived from the judicial function of the Constitutional Court, does not occur in the contentious-administrative jurisdiction, since the Council of State has not managed to make a diligent issuance, compilation and publication of decisions with a binding character. This investigation focuses its attention on the contentious-administrative jurisdiction and on the binding nature of jurisprudence originating from the Council of State. Herein are studied new legal figures contemplated in Law 1437 of 2011 such as the duty of uniform application of jurisprudence, the extension of the jurisprudence of the Council of State to third parties by authorities, the extraordinary appeal of unification of jurisprudence and the judgments of unification.The binding nature of the judgments of unification issued by the Council of State is established in accordance to this law. It also shows how, if the application is achieved of the new figures and procedures studied, it will contribute to the recognition of the binding force of jurisprudence from the Council of State, clearing backlogs and protecting important values of the legal system, as well as equality of treatment and legal certainty in contentious-administrative issues.
format
Article
author
Vargas Florián, Sandra Mercedes
author_facet
Vargas Florián, Sandra Mercedes
author_sort
Vargas Florián, Sandra Mercedes
title
La fuerza vinculante de la jurisprudencia del Consejo de Estado
title_short
La fuerza vinculante de la jurisprudencia del Consejo de Estado
title_full
La fuerza vinculante de la jurisprudencia del Consejo de Estado
title_fullStr
La fuerza vinculante de la jurisprudencia del Consejo de Estado
title_full_unstemmed
La fuerza vinculante de la jurisprudencia del Consejo de Estado
title_sort
la fuerza vinculante de la jurisprudencia del consejo de estado
publishDate
2018
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6685101
_version_
1709748534588211200
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012983292018-11-30La fuerza vinculante de la jurisprudencia del Consejo de EstadoVargas Florián, Sandra Mercedesjurisprudencelawprecedentbinding forcejudicial arbitrationjudgeadministrationjurisprudencialeyprecedentefuerza vinculantearbitrio judicialjuezadministraciónjurisprudêncialeiprecedenteforça vinculantearbítrio judicialjuizadministraçãoConstitutional jurisprudence is considered a formal and material source of law in the Colombian legal system, hence its binding force in the decisions of judicial and administrative authorities. This recognition, derived from the judicial function of the Constitutional Court, does not occur in the contentious-administrative jurisdiction, since the Council of State has not managed to make a diligent issuance, compilation and publication of decisions with a binding character. This investigation focuses its attention on the contentious-administrative jurisdiction and on the binding nature of jurisprudence originating from the Council of State. Herein are studied new legal figures contemplated in Law 1437 of 2011 such as the duty of uniform application of jurisprudence, the extension of the jurisprudence of the Council of State to third parties by authorities, the extraordinary appeal of unification of jurisprudence and the judgments of unification.The binding nature of the judgments of unification issued by the Council of State is established in accordance to this law. It also shows how, if the application is achieved of the new figures and procedures studied, it will contribute to the recognition of the binding force of jurisprudence from the Council of State, clearing backlogs and protecting important values of the legal system, as well as equality of treatment and legal certainty in contentious-administrative issues.A jurisprudência constitucional é considerada como fonte formal e material do direito no sistema jurídico colombiano, daí procede a sua forca vinculante nas decisões de autoridades judiciais e administrativas. Este reconhecimento derivado da função judicial da Corte Constitucional não ocorre na jurisdição do contencioso administrativo, toda vez que o Conselho de Estado não tem se ocupado de uma diligente expedição, recopilação e publicação de sentenças com caráter vinculante.Esta pesquisa foca sua atenção na jurisdição do contencioso administrativo e no caráter vinculante da jurisprudência emanada do Conselho de Estado. São estudadas novas figuras jurídicas contempladas na Lei 1437 de 2011, como: o dever de aplicação uniforme da jurisprudência, a extensão da jurisprudência do Conselho de Estado a terceiros por parte das autoridades, o recurso extraordinário de unificação de jurisprudência e as sentenças de unificação.Estabelece-se o caráter vinculante que ostentam as sentenças de unificação proferidas pelo Conselho de Estado de acordo com esta lei. Além se mostra como se conseguir a aplicação das novas figuras e os procedimentos estudados se contribuirá ao reconhecimento da força vinculante da jurisprudência emanada do Conselho de Estado o descongestionamento judicial e a proteção de valores importantes do sistema jurídico, assim como à igualdade de trato e segurança jurídica no relacionado com o contencioso administrativo.La jurisprudencia constitucional es considerada como fuente formal y material del derecho en el sistema jurídico colombiano, de ahí procede su fuerza vinculante en las decisiones de las autoridades judiciales y administrativas. Este reconocimiento, derivado de la función judicial de la Corte Constitucional, no se da en la jurisdicción de lo contencioso administrativo, toda vez que el Consejo de Estado no se ha ocupado de una acuciosa expedición, recopilación y publicación de sentencias con carácter vinculante. Esta investigación enfoca su atención en la jurisdicción de lo contencioso administrativo y en el carácter vinculante de la jurisprudencia emanada del Consejo de Estado. Son estudiadas aquí nuevas figuras jurídicas contempladas en la Ley 1437 de 2011, tales como el deber de aplicación uniforme de la jurisprudencia, la extensión de la jurisprudencia del Consejo de Estado a terceros por parte de las autoridades, el recurso extraordinario de unificación de la jurisprudencia y las sentencias de unificación.Se establece el carácter vinculante que ostentan las sentencias de unificación proferidas por el Consejo de Estado de conformidad con esta ley. Además se muestra cómo, si se logra la aplicación de las nuevas figuras y los procedimientos estudiados, se contribuirá al reconocimiento de la fuerza vinculante de la jurisprudencia emanada del Consejo de Estado, a la descongestión judicial y a la protección de valores importantes del sistema jurídico, así como a la igualdad de trato y seguridad jurídica en materia de lo contencioso administrativo.2018text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6685101(Revista) ISSN 2500-5286(Revista) ISSN 1900-0448IUSTA, ISSN 1900-0448, Vol. 1, Nº. 48, 2018, pags. 119-144spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI