Does the Inviolability of Archives Lead to a Catch-22 Situation?
In contrast to Joseph Heller’s novel ‘Catch-22’, the illogical or paradoxical situation arising from the privilege of inviolability of archives in international organisations’ cooperation with national in the fight against fraud and corruption is one of different legal orders that are not necessaril...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6629096 |
| Source: | IUS : revista del Instituto de Ciencias Jurídicas de Puebla, ISSN 1870-2147, null 11, Nº. 40, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Derechos Humanos y Política Internacional), pags. 183-200 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001292104
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
IUS : revista del Instituto de Ciencias Jurídicas de Puebla, ISSN 1870-2147, null 11, Nº. 40, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Derechos Humanos y Política Internacional), pags. 183-200
|
| language |
English
|
| topic |
Confidentiality
fight against corruption human rights violations international organizations Confidencialidad lucha contra la corrupción violaciones de derechos humanos organizaciones internacionales |
| spellingShingle |
Confidentiality
fight against corruption human rights violations international organizations Confidencialidad lucha contra la corrupción violaciones de derechos humanos organizaciones internacionales Kaiser, Karen Does the Inviolability of Archives Lead to a Catch-22 Situation? |
| description |
In contrast to Joseph Heller’s novel ‘Catch-22’, the illogical or paradoxical situation arising from the privilege of inviolability of archives in international organisations’ cooperation with national in the fight against fraud and corruption is one of different legal orders that are not necessarily aligned from the outset. National law enforcement and judicial authorities have to respect the privilege of inviolability of archives enjoyed by international organisations. They may neither interpret the privilege restrictively without taking full account at the same time of the purpose of privileges, i.e. the orderly and independent operation of international organisations, nor generally limit the privilege in any other way. It therefore lies in the hands of international organisations themselves to limit the risk of a catch-22 situation arising from the privilege of inviolability of archives in their cooperation with national authorities. However, the onus is not only on international organisations. Any reasonable use of the privilege presupposes that national law enforcement and judicial authorities acknowledge its existence and deal with it respectfully.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Kaiser, Karen
|
| author_facet |
Kaiser, Karen
|
| author_sort |
Kaiser, Karen
|
| title |
Does the Inviolability of Archives Lead to a Catch-22 Situation?
|
| title_short |
Does the Inviolability of Archives Lead to a Catch-22 Situation?
|
| title_full |
Does the Inviolability of Archives Lead to a Catch-22 Situation?
|
| title_fullStr |
Does the Inviolability of Archives Lead to a Catch-22 Situation?
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Does the Inviolability of Archives Lead to a Catch-22 Situation?
|
| title_sort |
does the inviolability of archives lead to a catch-22 situation?
|
| publishDate |
2017
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6629096
|
| _version_ |
1727401147894857728
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012921042022-03-13Does the Inviolability of Archives Lead to a Catch-22 Situation?Kaiser, KarenConfidentialityfight against corruptionhuman rights violationsinternational organizationsConfidencialidadlucha contra la corrupciónviolaciones de derechos humanosorganizaciones internacionalesIn contrast to Joseph Heller’s novel ‘Catch-22’, the illogical or paradoxical situation arising from the privilege of inviolability of archives in international organisations’ cooperation with national in the fight against fraud and corruption is one of different legal orders that are not necessarily aligned from the outset. National law enforcement and judicial authorities have to respect the privilege of inviolability of archives enjoyed by international organisations. They may neither interpret the privilege restrictively without taking full account at the same time of the purpose of privileges, i.e. the orderly and independent operation of international organisations, nor generally limit the privilege in any other way. It therefore lies in the hands of international organisations themselves to limit the risk of a catch-22 situation arising from the privilege of inviolability of archives in their cooperation with national authorities. However, the onus is not only on international organisations. Any reasonable use of the privilege presupposes that national law enforcement and judicial authorities acknowledge its existence and deal with it respectfully.A diferencia de la novela de Joseph Heller ‘Trampa 22’, la situación ilógica o paradójica que surge del privilegio de inviolabilidad de los archivos dentro de la cooperación de organizaciones internacionales con autoridades nacionales en el marco de la lucha contra el fraude y la corrupción es uno de los diferentes órdenes jurídicos que no necesariamente están alineados desde el principio. Las autoridades nacionales tienen que respetar la inviolabilidad de los archivos de organizaciones internacionales y no pueden ni interpretar el privilegio de manera restrictiva, sin tomar en cuenta al mismo tiempo su propósito, que es la operación ordenada e independiente de las organizaciones internacionales; y tampoco limitar el privilegio de alguna otra manera. Por lo tanto, queda en manos de las organizaciones internacionales en sí mismas el limitar el riesgo de una situación de Trampa 22, al cumplir con su deber de cooperar con autoridades nacionales. Sin embargo, la carga de la prueba no solo recae en las organizaciones internacionales. Cualquier uso razonable del privilegio presupone que las autoridades nacionales reconocen su existencia y la abordan de manera respetuosa.2017text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6629096(Revista) ISSN 1870-2147IUS : revista del Instituto de Ciencias Jurídicas de Puebla, ISSN 1870-2147, null 11, Nº. 40, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Derechos Humanos y Política Internacional), pags. 183-200engLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|