Marco evolutivo y situación general de la prisión preventiva en México
In general, Latin America has had serious problems with the detention of persons awaiting trial, which represented more than 68% of prisoners in the eighties and currently in our country rounds about 40%. The violations of the human rights of these detainees are manifest; as the pretrial detention,...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Idioma: | Castellano |
| Publicado: |
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6622385 |
| Fuente: | Dikê: Revista de Investigación en Derecho, Criminología y Consultoría Jurídica, ISSN 1870-6924, Nº. 19, 2016, pags. 5-27 |
| Etiquetas: |
Añadir etiqueta
Sin etiquetas: Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001291673
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Dikê: Revista de Investigación en Derecho, Criminología y Consultoría Jurídica, ISSN 1870-6924, Nº. 19, 2016, pags. 5-27
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Reforma penal
prisión preventiva México Criminal Reform Preventive Prison Mexico |
| spellingShingle |
Reforma penal
prisión preventiva México Criminal Reform Preventive Prison Mexico Villarreal Palos, Arturo Marco evolutivo y situación general de la prisión preventiva en México |
| description |
In general, Latin America has had serious problems
with the detention of persons awaiting trial,
which represented more than 68% of prisoners in
the eighties and currently in our country rounds
about 40%. The violations of the human rights
of these detainees are manifest; as the pretrial
detention, by its generality and duration, is a sort
of punishment in advance, contrary to its nature
as a precautionary measure.
This article makes an analysis of pretrial detention
in Mexico, starting with the established
paradigm on the basis of the Constitution of 1917
and the new one that derives from the constitutional
reform of June 2008, which for the first
time establishes its subsidiary and exceptional
character. The author believes that these reforms
can contribute significantly to reduce pretrial detention
in our country in the medium term, as it
is evidenced by the development of penal reform
in Latin America and the current emerging followup
studies of Criminal transformation in Mexico.
It is concluded that the European experience has
demonstrated that it is feasible to achieve significant
reductions between 10 and 20% of prisoners
in preventive detention and to those standards it
should be aimed.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Villarreal Palos, Arturo
|
| author_facet |
Villarreal Palos, Arturo
|
| author_sort |
Villarreal Palos, Arturo
|
| title |
Marco evolutivo y situación general de la prisión preventiva en México
|
| title_short |
Marco evolutivo y situación general de la prisión preventiva en México
|
| title_full |
Marco evolutivo y situación general de la prisión preventiva en México
|
| title_fullStr |
Marco evolutivo y situación general de la prisión preventiva en México
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Marco evolutivo y situación general de la prisión preventiva en México
|
| title_sort |
marco evolutivo y situación general de la prisión preventiva en méxico
|
| publishDate |
2016
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6622385
|
| _version_ |
1709748001173405696
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012916732018-10-31Marco evolutivo y situación general de la prisión preventiva en MéxicoVillarreal Palos, ArturoReforma penalprisión preventivaMéxicoCriminal ReformPreventive PrisonMexicoIn general, Latin America has had serious problems with the detention of persons awaiting trial, which represented more than 68% of prisoners in the eighties and currently in our country rounds about 40%. The violations of the human rights of these detainees are manifest; as the pretrial detention, by its generality and duration, is a sort of punishment in advance, contrary to its nature as a precautionary measure. This article makes an analysis of pretrial detention in Mexico, starting with the established paradigm on the basis of the Constitution of 1917 and the new one that derives from the constitutional reform of June 2008, which for the first time establishes its subsidiary and exceptional character. The author believes that these reforms can contribute significantly to reduce pretrial detention in our country in the medium term, as it is evidenced by the development of penal reform in Latin America and the current emerging followup studies of Criminal transformation in Mexico. It is concluded that the European experience has demonstrated that it is feasible to achieve significant reductions between 10 and 20% of prisoners in preventive detention and to those standards it should be aimed.En lo general, América Latina ha tenido un problema grave con el encarcelamiento de personas en espera de juicio, mismo que en los años ochenta del siglo pasado representó más del 68% de los reclusos y en nuestro país ronda en la actualidad alrededor del 40%. Las violaciones a los derechos humanos de estos detenidos son manifiestas, en tanto la prisión preventiva, por su generalidad y duración, se constituye en una suerte de pena anticipada, contraviniendo su naturaleza de medida cautelar. El presente trabajo realiza un análisis de la prisión preventiva en México, iniciando con el paradigma establecido a partir de la Constitución de 1917 y el nuevo que deriva de la reforma constitucional de junio de 2008, el cual, por primera vez establece su carácter subsidiario y excepcional. El autor estima que estas reformas pueden contribuir de manera muy importante a reducir la prisión preventiva en nuestro país en el mediano plazo, pues así lo evidencia el desarrollo de la reforma penal en latinoamericana y los, ahora, incipientes estudios de seguimiento a la transformación penal en México. Se concluye que la experiencia europea ha demostrado que es factible lograr reducciones significativas de entre el 10 y el 20% de presos en prisión preventiva y que a esos estándares se debe aspirar.2016text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6622385(Revista) ISSN 1870-6924Dikê: Revista de Investigación en Derecho, Criminología y Consultoría Jurídica, ISSN 1870-6924, Nº. 19, 2016, pags. 5-27spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|