Participación de dirigentes partidistas en spots de radio y televisión: permisividad versus restricción, a la luz de criterios jurisprudenciales
Between 2016 and 2017, the Superior Chamber of the Electoral Court of the Federal Judicial Branch ordered the National Electoral Institute, via judgments, to draw up guidelines that would serve to identify behaviors that could constitute violations of the regulations on political and electoral commu...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6622285 |
| Source: | Dikê: Revista de Investigación en Derecho, Criminología y Consultoría Jurídica, ISSN 1870-6924, Nº. 24, 2018, pags. 111-142 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
Between 2016 and 2017, the Superior Chamber of
the Electoral Court of the Federal Judicial Branch
ordered the National Electoral Institute, via judgments,
to draw up guidelines that would serve
to identify behaviors that could constitute violations
of the regulations on political and electoral
communication. These guidelines once elaborated,
were considered by the Superior Court itself to be
excessive. The cases derived from these resolutions
are discussed in this article. Their relevance is that
they sought to regulate the guidelines. These were
considered the standard to a dialogue between
the electoral administrative authority and the jurisdictional
authority. Additionally, the discussion
of these practical cases provided a pattern that
opened a debate around the validity of a concept
that has been established as the main pillar of the
Mexican Electoral System: Which raises the question;
is there equity in the political contest? At least
on how it has been conceived until now. |
|---|