La segunda instancia: Una probabilidad de la sentencia en mínima cuantía

Some theories of juridical argumentation are described, an input for judges in the daily discipline of making decisions; a point of view which, for its addressees, may be consistent with a recriminated or accepted position, since, at any given moment, fundamental interests and/ or principles could b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hernández Montañez, Orlando Gilbert
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6551393
Source:Via Inveniendi et Iudicandi, ISSN 1909-0528, Vol. 13, Nº. 1, 2018, pags. 189-216
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001283865
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Via Inveniendi et Iudicandi, ISSN 1909-0528, Vol. 13, Nº. 1, 2018, pags. 189-216
language
Spanish
topic
interpretación jurídica
constitucionalismo contemporáneo
indexación
sentencias
derecho sustancial
casos difíciles
legal interpretation
contemporary constitutionalism
indexing
sentences
substantive law
difficult cases
spellingShingle
interpretación jurídica
constitucionalismo contemporáneo
indexación
sentencias
derecho sustancial
casos difíciles
legal interpretation
contemporary constitutionalism
indexing
sentences
substantive law
difficult cases
Hernández Montañez, Orlando Gilbert
La segunda instancia: Una probabilidad de la sentencia en mínima cuantía
description
Some theories of juridical argumentation are described, an input for judges in the daily discipline of making decisions; a point of view which, for its addressees, may be consistent with a recriminated or accepted position, since, at any given moment, fundamental interests and/ or principles could be affected when dealing with economic rights derived from a conflict.Of old, the judicial work of the administrators of justice in front of this sacramental final decision, which although it does not constitute a closure of instance, if it is, in some events has been looked at with a brief attention, in a scenario of complexity arising from the correct application of the right to the particular case or, in other words, from the subsumption of the factual assumption in the norm; they contribute or generate changes in interpretation, argumentation and application of the law, and a response is provided in response to the demands invoked by the litigants or intervening third parties. Also, the legal effects of the sentence, as a resolution that goes beyond the judicial to the social (Ezquiaga Ganuzas, s.f.), will be dealt with, in order to confront the reality of the community by wanting to defend their points of view and bring to the debate the positions supported in the multiple theories.The judge’s behavioral pattern of spring will be evaluated in cases where claims for assets do not exceed the limits of the minimum amount, but at the time of making their decision, inflation is shown as compensation for damages, updating sums, compensation, the payment of fruits or improvements, etc., visualizing the possibility of opening the door of a second evaluator in hierarchical order, when the argumentative position is not shared and yet, their knowledge is restricted given the quantum of the initial economic pretension that by the work of indexation or some other scheme, exceeds the primal pecuniary boundaries for procedural becoming.
format
Article
author
Hernández Montañez, Orlando Gilbert
author_facet
Hernández Montañez, Orlando Gilbert
author_sort
Hernández Montañez, Orlando Gilbert
title
La segunda instancia: Una probabilidad de la sentencia en mínima cuantía
title_short
La segunda instancia: Una probabilidad de la sentencia en mínima cuantía
title_full
La segunda instancia: Una probabilidad de la sentencia en mínima cuantía
title_fullStr
La segunda instancia: Una probabilidad de la sentencia en mínima cuantía
title_full_unstemmed
La segunda instancia: Una probabilidad de la sentencia en mínima cuantía
title_sort
la segunda instancia: una probabilidad de la sentencia en mínima cuantía
publishDate
2018
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6551393
_version_
1709748412175351808
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012838652018-09-21La segunda instancia: Una probabilidad de la sentencia en mínima cuantíaHernández Montañez, Orlando Gilbertinterpretación jurídicaconstitucionalismo contemporáneoindexaciónsentenciasderecho sustancialcasos difícileslegal interpretationcontemporary constitutionalismindexingsentencessubstantive lawdifficult casesSome theories of juridical argumentation are described, an input for judges in the daily discipline of making decisions; a point of view which, for its addressees, may be consistent with a recriminated or accepted position, since, at any given moment, fundamental interests and/ or principles could be affected when dealing with economic rights derived from a conflict.Of old, the judicial work of the administrators of justice in front of this sacramental final decision, which although it does not constitute a closure of instance, if it is, in some events has been looked at with a brief attention, in a scenario of complexity arising from the correct application of the right to the particular case or, in other words, from the subsumption of the factual assumption in the norm; they contribute or generate changes in interpretation, argumentation and application of the law, and a response is provided in response to the demands invoked by the litigants or intervening third parties. Also, the legal effects of the sentence, as a resolution that goes beyond the judicial to the social (Ezquiaga Ganuzas, s.f.), will be dealt with, in order to confront the reality of the community by wanting to defend their points of view and bring to the debate the positions supported in the multiple theories.The judge’s behavioral pattern of spring will be evaluated in cases where claims for assets do not exceed the limits of the minimum amount, but at the time of making their decision, inflation is shown as compensation for damages, updating sums, compensation, the payment of fruits or improvements, etc., visualizing the possibility of opening the door of a second evaluator in hierarchical order, when the argumentative position is not shared and yet, their knowledge is restricted given the quantum of the initial economic pretension that by the work of indexation or some other scheme, exceeds the primal pecuniary boundaries for procedural becoming.Se describen algunas teorías de la argumentación jurídica, insumo para los jueces en la disciplina diaria de tomar decisiones; un punto de vista que, para sus destinatarios, puede ser consecuente con una posición recriminada o aceptada, por cuanto, en un momento dado, se podrían afectar intereses y principios fundamentales a la hora de versar sobre derechos patrimoniales derivados de un conflicto.De antaño, se ha mirado con somero detenimiento el laborío judicial de los administradores de justicia frente a esa sacramental decisión última, que si bien no constituye un cierre de instancia, sí lo es, en algunos eventos; en un escenario de complejidad procedente de la correcta aplicación del derecho al caso particular o, dicho en otras frases, de la subsunción del supuesto fáctico en la norma; se aportan o generan cambios de interpretación, argumentación y aplicación de la ley, y de contera se brinda una respuesta en socorro de las exigencias invocadas por los litigantes o terceros intervinientes. También, se abordarán los efectos jurídicos de la sentencia, como resolución que trasciende de lo judicial a lo social (Ezquiaga Ganuzas, s. f.), con ánimo de afrontar la realidad de la comunidad al querer defender sus puntos de vista y llevar a debate las posiciones apoyadas en las múltiples teorías.Se evaluará la catadura comportamental de resorte del juez en casos donde las pretensiones patrimoniales no excedan los topes de la mínima cuantía, pero que, al momento de adoptar su decisión, se demuestra una inflación derivada de una indemnización de perjuicios, actualización de sumas, compensación, el pago de frutos o mejoras, etcétera, visualizándose la posibilidad de abrir la puerta de un segundo evaluador en orden jerárquico, cuando no se comparte la postura argumentativa y, sin embargo, se restringe su conocimiento dado el quantum de la pretensión económica inicial que por obra de la indexación o por algún otro ardid supera los lindes pecuniarios primigenios para el devenir procesal.2018text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6551393(Revista) ISSN 1909-0528Via Inveniendi et Iudicandi, ISSN 1909-0528, Vol. 13, Nº. 1, 2018, pags. 189-216spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI