Apuntes sobre el derecho de uso de la vivienda familiar en Italia
The purpose of this study is to compare the right to use the family home in Spain and Italy. Regarding the differences between both legal systems, emphasis should be placed, in particular, on two. The first is the rigidity of the solutions offered by Italian law, caused by the fact of not having aut...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6510522 |
| Source: | Revista Boliviana de Derecho, ISSN 2070-8157, Nº. 26, 2018, pags. 360-377 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001277377
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012773772022-06-16Apuntes sobre el derecho de uso de la vivienda familiar en ItaliaChaparro Matamoros, PedroDerecho de usovivienda familiaroponibilidad del derecho de usouniones de hechoRight to usefamily homeenforceability of the right to useunmarried coupleThe purpose of this study is to compare the right to use the family home in Spain and Italy. Regarding the differences between both legal systems, emphasis should be placed, in particular, on two. The first is the rigidity of the solutions offered by Italian law, caused by the fact of not having autonomic regulations on family relations such as the one in Spain (which, as noted, contains alternative remedies to article 96 CC). The second of the differences has to do with the protection regime of the spouse economically disadvantaged by the rupture. In Italy, unlike what happens in Spain, there is no provision similar to art. 96.III CC.El objeto del presente estudio es comparar el derecho de uso de la vivienda familiar en España y en Italia. En cuanto a las diferencias entre ambos ordenamientos jurídicos, ha de hacerse hincapié, principalmente, en dos. La primera de ellas es la parquedad y rigidez de las soluciones que ofrece el Derecho italiano, al no tener una normativa autonómica en materia de relaciones familiares como la existente en España (que, como se ha apuntado, contiene remedios alternativos al art. 96 CC). La segunda de las diferencias tiene que ver con el régimen de protección del cónyuge perjudicado económicamente por la ruptura. En Italia, a diferencia de lo previsto en España, no existe una disposición similar al art. 96.III CC.2018text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6510522(Revista) ISSN 2070-8157Revista Boliviana de Derecho, ISSN 2070-8157, Nº. 26, 2018, pags. 360-377spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Boliviana de Derecho, ISSN 2070-8157, Nº. 26, 2018, pags. 360-377
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Derecho de uso
vivienda familiar oponibilidad del derecho de uso uniones de hecho Right to use family home enforceability of the right to use unmarried couple |
| spellingShingle |
Derecho de uso
vivienda familiar oponibilidad del derecho de uso uniones de hecho Right to use family home enforceability of the right to use unmarried couple Chaparro Matamoros, Pedro Apuntes sobre el derecho de uso de la vivienda familiar en Italia |
| description |
The purpose of this study is to compare the right to use the family home in Spain and Italy.
Regarding the differences between both legal systems, emphasis should be placed, in particular, on two. The first
is the rigidity of the solutions offered by Italian law, caused by the fact of not having autonomic regulations on
family relations such as the one in Spain (which, as noted, contains alternative remedies to article 96 CC). The
second of the differences has to do with the protection regime of the spouse economically disadvantaged by the
rupture. In Italy, unlike what happens in Spain, there is no provision similar to art. 96.III CC.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Chaparro Matamoros, Pedro
|
| author_facet |
Chaparro Matamoros, Pedro
|
| author_sort |
Chaparro Matamoros, Pedro
|
| title |
Apuntes sobre el derecho de uso de la vivienda familiar en Italia
|
| title_short |
Apuntes sobre el derecho de uso de la vivienda familiar en Italia
|
| title_full |
Apuntes sobre el derecho de uso de la vivienda familiar en Italia
|
| title_fullStr |
Apuntes sobre el derecho de uso de la vivienda familiar en Italia
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Apuntes sobre el derecho de uso de la vivienda familiar en Italia
|
| title_sort |
apuntes sobre el derecho de uso de la vivienda familiar en italia
|
| publishDate |
2018
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6510522
|
| _version_ |
1735913418987143168
|