Leges in aeternum latae y leges mortales: El debate sobre la derogación de la lex oppia según tito livio 34.1-8,

Through the analysis of the speeches of the consul M.P. Cato and the tribune L. Valerius in the debate on the repeal of thelex Oppia (195 b.C.), this paper tries to determine the consistencyand the scope of the distinction between leges in aeternum lataeand leges in aliquod tempus latae that tribune...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cuena Boy, Francisco
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Permanent laws
perishable laws
the Oppian law
law derogation
Derecho Romano
Leyes permanentes
leyes perecederas
ley Opia
derogación de la ley
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6498953
Source:Ars Boni et Aequi, ISSN 0719-2568, Vol. 13, Nº. 2, 2017, pags. 157-189
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Leges in aeternum latae y leges mortales: El debate sobre la derogación de la lex oppia según tito livio 34.1-8,
Summary: Through the analysis of the speeches of the consul M.P. Cato and the tribune L. Valerius in the debate on the repeal of thelex Oppia (195 b.C.), this paper tries to determine the consistencyand the scope of the distinction between leges in aeternum lataeand leges in aliquod tempus latae that tribune Valerius would haveused as the main argument in favor of repeal. The conclusion reachedis that such a distinction lacks theoretical solidity, at least atthe historical moment in which it was apparently formulated, andthat its scope, merely tactical, is limited to the concrete discussionon the lex Oppia.

Similar Items