El amparo de aguas en la jurisprudencia chilena (2013-2015)
This research approaches, from a recent practice, the judicial configuration of the water rights in Chile, especially the regime of defense of the use of waters and, the access to justice of those who feel affected by administrative bodies or third parties. This work consists of an empirical study c...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6416838 |
| Source: | Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 41, 2018, pags. 197-225 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001263586
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012635862018-05-24El amparo de aguas en la jurisprudencia chilena (2013-2015)Delgado Schneider, Verónica PíaÁlvez Marín, AmayaOchoa Tobar, Fernando E.Sandoval Muñoz, María IgnaciaAguaamparoderecho de aprovechamientoperjuicioentorpecimientoWaterwaters writwater rightsdamagesobstructionThis research approaches, from a recent practice, the judicial configuration of the water rights in Chile, especially the regime of defense of the use of waters and, the access to justice of those who feel affected by administrative bodies or third parties. This work consists of an empirical study concerning the judgments handed down in judicial actions for water protection, in the first instance, between the years 2013-2015, with some judgments of the Superior Courts of Justice. The work reflects on the interpretation that the Courts have given on the requirements of origin of this action, especially to detect in which cases it is accepted and in which cases it is rejected, concluding that they are important differences. For example, when to consider that the facts or works that generates the obstructions are recent or not. The casuistry shows that the action generally serves for problems faced by irrigators. The study also verifies that the action is applied with respect to present or future damages and, therefore, is also a preventive tool of damages.La presente investigación aborda, desde la práctica reciente, la configuración judicial del derecho de aguas en Chile, especialmente en una materia clave como es el régimen de defensa del derecho de aprovechamiento de las aguas y, con ello, el acceso a la justicia de quienes se sienten afectados. Este trabajo consiste en un estudio empírico relativo a los fallos dictados en acciones judiciales de amparo de aguas, en primera instancia, entre los años 2013-2015, con algunos fallos de los tribunales superiores de justicia. El trabajo reflexiona sobre la interpretación que los tribunales han dado sobre los requisitos de procedencia de esta acción, especialmente para detectar en qué casos resulta acogida y en qué otros se rechaza, detectando diferencias importantes en materia de cuándo considerar que los hechos u obras generadoras del entorpecimiento que se pide terminar son o no recientes. La casuística demuestra que la acción sirve generalmente para problemas que enfrentan los regantes. El estudio comprueba además que la acción se aplica respecto a daños presentes o futuros y, por ende, es una herramienta preventiva de daños.2018text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6416838(Revista) ISSN 0122-9893Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 41, 2018, pags. 197-225spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Derecho del Estado, ISSN 0122-9893, Nº. 41, 2018, pags. 197-225
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Agua
amparo derecho de aprovechamiento perjuicio entorpecimiento Water waters writ water rights damages obstruction |
| spellingShingle |
Agua
amparo derecho de aprovechamiento perjuicio entorpecimiento Water waters writ water rights damages obstruction Delgado Schneider, Verónica Pía Álvez Marín, Amaya Ochoa Tobar, Fernando E. Sandoval Muñoz, María Ignacia El amparo de aguas en la jurisprudencia chilena (2013-2015) |
| description |
This research approaches, from a recent practice, the judicial configuration of the water rights in Chile, especially the regime of defense of the use of waters and, the access to justice of those who feel affected by administrative bodies or third parties. This work consists of an empirical study concerning the judgments handed down in judicial actions for water protection, in the first instance, between the years 2013-2015, with some judgments of the Superior Courts of Justice. The work reflects on the interpretation that the Courts have given on the requirements of origin of this action, especially to detect in which cases it is accepted and in which cases it is rejected, concluding that they are important differences. For example, when to consider that the facts or works that generates the obstructions are recent or not. The casuistry shows that the action generally serves for problems faced by irrigators. The study also verifies that the action is applied with respect to present or future damages and, therefore, is also a preventive tool of damages.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Delgado Schneider, Verónica Pía
Álvez Marín, Amaya Ochoa Tobar, Fernando E. Sandoval Muñoz, María Ignacia |
| author_facet |
Delgado Schneider, Verónica Pía
Álvez Marín, Amaya Ochoa Tobar, Fernando E. Sandoval Muñoz, María Ignacia |
| author_sort |
Delgado Schneider, Verónica Pía
|
| title |
El amparo de aguas en la jurisprudencia chilena (2013-2015)
|
| title_short |
El amparo de aguas en la jurisprudencia chilena (2013-2015)
|
| title_full |
El amparo de aguas en la jurisprudencia chilena (2013-2015)
|
| title_fullStr |
El amparo de aguas en la jurisprudencia chilena (2013-2015)
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
El amparo de aguas en la jurisprudencia chilena (2013-2015)
|
| title_sort |
el amparo de aguas en la jurisprudencia chilena (2013-2015)
|
| publishDate |
2018
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6416838
|
| _version_ |
1709751471878176768
|