La competencia judicial frente a sanciones disciplinarias consistentes en retiro del servicio
The purpose of this research was to determine the competent court to hear complaints against administrative acts imposing disciplinary sanctions of suspension or dismissal issued by other than the Attorney General’s Office authorities. The methodology was descriptive, theoretical reflection and crit...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6331304 |
| Source: | Derecho Público, ISSN 1909-7778, Nº. 37, 2016 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001253723
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Derecho Público, ISSN 1909-7778, Nº. 37, 2016
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
competencia judicial
sanción disciplinaria destitución suspensión omisión legislativa Jurisdiction and Disciplinary Punishment Dismissal Suspension legislative omission competência judicial sanção disciplinar destituição suspensão omissão legislativa |
| spellingShingle |
competencia judicial
sanción disciplinaria destitución suspensión omisión legislativa Jurisdiction and Disciplinary Punishment Dismissal Suspension legislative omission competência judicial sanção disciplinar destituição suspensão omissão legislativa Ortega Fernández, Román José La competencia judicial frente a sanciones disciplinarias consistentes en retiro del servicio |
| description |
The purpose of this research was to determine the competent court to hear complaints against administrative acts imposing disciplinary sanctions of suspension or dismissal issued by other than the Attorney General’s Office authorities. The methodology was descriptive, theoretical reflection and critical analysis, a process of historical background check for a universal frame of reference was made. It was noted that before the Legislative Omission of the law 1437 of 2011, the Second Section of the State Council implied powers granted by analogy, extension and assimilation to the Administrative Courts in the first instance to hear these matters. It was concluded that the allocation of powers is constitutional and legal reserve and that the position of the State Council set up an organic defect due to lack of functional competence that violates the right to be heard by a judge.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Ortega Fernández, Román José
|
| author_facet |
Ortega Fernández, Román José
|
| author_sort |
Ortega Fernández, Román José
|
| title |
La competencia judicial frente a sanciones disciplinarias consistentes en retiro del servicio
|
| title_short |
La competencia judicial frente a sanciones disciplinarias consistentes en retiro del servicio
|
| title_full |
La competencia judicial frente a sanciones disciplinarias consistentes en retiro del servicio
|
| title_fullStr |
La competencia judicial frente a sanciones disciplinarias consistentes en retiro del servicio
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
La competencia judicial frente a sanciones disciplinarias consistentes en retiro del servicio
|
| title_sort |
la competencia judicial frente a sanciones disciplinarias consistentes en retiro del servicio
|
| publishDate |
2016
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6331304
|
| _version_ |
1709746990151106560
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012537232018-03-14La competencia judicial frente a sanciones disciplinarias consistentes en retiro del servicioOrtega Fernández, Román Josécompetencia judicialsanción disciplinariadestituciónsuspensiónomisión legislativaJurisdiction and Disciplinary PunishmentDismissalSuspensionlegislative omissioncompetência judicialsanção disciplinardestituiçãosuspensãoomissão legislativaThe purpose of this research was to determine the competent court to hear complaints against administrative acts imposing disciplinary sanctions of suspension or dismissal issued by other than the Attorney General’s Office authorities. The methodology was descriptive, theoretical reflection and critical analysis, a process of historical background check for a universal frame of reference was made. It was noted that before the Legislative Omission of the law 1437 of 2011, the Second Section of the State Council implied powers granted by analogy, extension and assimilation to the Administrative Courts in the first instance to hear these matters. It was concluded that the allocation of powers is constitutional and legal reserve and that the position of the State Council set up an organic defect due to lack of functional competence that violates the right to be heard by a judge.O propósito desta investigação foi determinar o juiz competente para conhecer as demandas contra os atos administrativos que impõem sanções disciplinares como suspensão ou destituição, expedidos por autoridades diferentes à Procuradoria Geral da Nação. A metodologia foi descritiva de reflexão teórica e análise crítica; realizou-se um processo de revisão histórica com antecedentes para um âmbito referencial universal. Observou-se que ante a omissão legislativa da lei 1437 de 2011, A Seção Segunda do Conselho de Estado outorgou competência implícita, por analogia, extensão e assimilação dos Tribunais Administrativos em primeira instância para conhecer estes assuntos. Concluiu-se que a assinação de competências é de reserva constitucional e legal e que a postura do Conselho de Estado configura um defeito orgânico por falta de competência funcional que violenta o direito para ser julgado por um juiz natural.El propósito de esta investigación fue determinar el juez competente para conocer de las demandas en contra de actos administrativos que imponen sanciones disciplinarias de suspensión o destitución, expedidos por autoridades distintas a la Procuraduría General de la Nación. La metodología fue descriptiva, de reflexión teórica y análisis crítico; se realizó un proceso de revisión histórica de antecedentes para un marco referencial universal. Se observó que ante la omisión legislativa de la Ley 1437 de 2011, la Sección Segunda del Consejo de Estado otorgó competencia implícita, por analogía, extensión y asimilación a los Tribunales Administrativos en primera instancia para conocer de estos asuntos. Se concluyó que la asignación de competencias es de reserva constitucional y legal y que la postura del Consejo de Estado configura un defecto orgánico por falta de competencia funcional que viola el derecho a ser juzgado por un juez natural.2016text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6331304(Revista) ISSN 1909-7778Derecho Público, ISSN 1909-7778, Nº. 37, 2016spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|