Un apunte sobre la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en materia de sistemas electorales
If in the beginning art. 3-P1 from the European Convention of Human Rights (CEDH) was interpreted as an institutional guarantee of free elections, with the passing of time its elucidation has evolved towards the recognition of the subjective rights of active and passive suffrage. In all, the Europea...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6273218 |
| Source: | Revista de Derecho Electoral, ISSN 1659-2069, Nº. 25, 2018 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001247644
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012476442018-02-06Un apunte sobre la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en materia de sistemas electoralesFernández Esquer, Carlossistemas electoralesderecho al sufragioprincipio de igualdadgarantías electoralesderechos políticosUnión Europeaproceso electoralTribunal Europeo de Derechos HumanosConvenio Europeo de Derechos Humanoselectoral systemsright to suffrageprinciple of equalityelectoral guaranteespolitical rightsEuropean Unionelectoral processEuropean Tribunal of Human RightsEuropean Convention of Human RightsIf in the beginning art. 3-P1 from the European Convention of Human Rights (CEDH) was interpreted as an institutional guarantee of free elections, with the passing of time its elucidation has evolved towards the recognition of the subjective rights of active and passive suffrage. In all, the European Tribunal of Human Rights (TEDH) has considered in compliance with CEDH any type of electoral system, resorting, for this purpose, to the doctrine of the margin of national appreciation. Thus, in spite of the fact that suffrage is considered one of the pillars of the European electoral heritage, the TEDH has not considered electoral systems that bring about obvious inequalities in the value of the vote of the citizens to be contrary to the Convention. Neither has it declared contrary to CEDH really elevated electoral barriers at a comparative levelSi en los inicios se interpretaba el art. 3-P1 del Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos (CEDH) como una garantía institucional de las elecciones libres, con el paso del tiempo su elucidación ha evolucionado hacia el reconocimiento de los derechos subjetivos de sufragio activo y pasivo. Con todo, el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos (TEDH) ha considerado conforme con el CEDH cualquier tipo de sistema electoral, recurriendo para ello a la doctrina del margen de apreciación nacional. Así, pese a que el sufragio igual se considera uno de los pilares del patrimonio electoral europeo, el TEDH no ha considerado contrarios al Convenio sistemas electorales que producen desigualdades evidentes en el valor del voto de los ciudadanos. Tampoco ha declarado contrarias al CEDH barreras electorales realmente elevadas a nivel comparado2018text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6273218(Revista) ISSN 1659-2069Revista de Derecho Electoral, ISSN 1659-2069, Nº. 25, 2018spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista de Derecho Electoral, ISSN 1659-2069, Nº. 25, 2018
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
sistemas electorales
derecho al sufragio principio de igualdad garantías electorales derechos políticos Unión Europea proceso electoral Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos electoral systems right to suffrage principle of equality electoral guarantees political rights European Union electoral process European Tribunal of Human Rights European Convention of Human Rights |
| spellingShingle |
sistemas electorales
derecho al sufragio principio de igualdad garantías electorales derechos políticos Unión Europea proceso electoral Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos Convenio Europeo de Derechos Humanos electoral systems right to suffrage principle of equality electoral guarantees political rights European Union electoral process European Tribunal of Human Rights European Convention of Human Rights Fernández Esquer, Carlos Un apunte sobre la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en materia de sistemas electorales |
| description |
If in the beginning art. 3-P1 from the European Convention of Human Rights (CEDH) was interpreted as an institutional guarantee of free elections, with the passing of time its elucidation has evolved towards the recognition of the subjective rights of active and passive suffrage. In all, the European Tribunal of Human Rights (TEDH) has considered in compliance with CEDH any type of electoral system, resorting, for this purpose, to the doctrine of the margin of national appreciation. Thus, in spite of the fact that suffrage is considered one of the pillars of the European electoral heritage, the TEDH has not considered electoral systems that bring about obvious inequalities in the value of the vote of the citizens to be contrary to the Convention. Neither has it declared contrary to CEDH really elevated electoral barriers at a comparative level
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Fernández Esquer, Carlos
|
| author_facet |
Fernández Esquer, Carlos
|
| author_sort |
Fernández Esquer, Carlos
|
| title |
Un apunte sobre la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en materia de sistemas electorales
|
| title_short |
Un apunte sobre la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en materia de sistemas electorales
|
| title_full |
Un apunte sobre la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en materia de sistemas electorales
|
| title_fullStr |
Un apunte sobre la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en materia de sistemas electorales
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Un apunte sobre la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en materia de sistemas electorales
|
| title_sort |
un apunte sobre la jurisprudencia del tribunal europeo de derechos humanos en materia de sistemas electorales
|
| publishDate |
2018
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6273218
|
| _version_ |
1709746960038100992
|