Lo público o lo privado: Un presupuesto de virtud en Aristóteles
One of the current themes of the whole of Aristotle’s political theory of the public versus the private, from which can be classified as virtue or vice of a government. But let it be understood, for Aristotle there can be good or bad policy, it does not become an ethics that determine. Thus, the iss...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2010
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6263281 |
| Source: | Revista Ratio Juris, ISSN 1794-6638, null 5, Nº. 11, 2010, pags. 145-158 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001245766
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012457662023-08-02Lo público o lo privado: Un presupuesto de virtud en AristótelesCadavid Guerrero, Iván AndrésvirtudpolíticaéticasociedadindividuoVirtuePoliticsEthicsSocietyindividualOne of the current themes of the whole of Aristotle’s political theory of the public versus the private, from which can be classified as virtue or vice of a government. But let it be understood, for Aristotle there can be good or bad policy, it does not become an ethics that determine. Thus, the issue of ethics under which the ruler is the one who is determined to choose between public and private, determines not only virtue but also the future of a political community. But here comes the problem, as you might think that if the individual is privileged society is neglected because contrario, if society is privileged, neglected the individual, how to get around this problem?, This and other similar questions are what is intended to address in this article.Uno de los temas coyunturales de toda la teoría política del estagirita es el de lo público versus lo privado, desde el cual puede catalogarse la virtud o el vicio de un gobierno. Pero, entiéndase bien, para Aristóteles no puede existir una política buena o mala, que no devenga de una ética que la determine. De este modo, el tema de la virtud ética del gobernante, que es quien está llamado a elegir entre lo público y lo privado, determina no solo su virtud sino también el futuro de una comunidad política. Pero aquí surge el problema, pues puede pensarse que si se privilegia al individuo se descuida a la sociedad, y a contrario sensu, si se privilegia la sociedad, se descuida al individuo. ¿Cómo sortear este problema? Ésta y otras cuestiones parecidas son las que se pretenden resolver en este artículo.2010text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6263281(Revista) ISSN 1794-6638Revista Ratio Juris, ISSN 1794-6638, null 5, Nº. 11, 2010, pags. 145-158spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista Ratio Juris, ISSN 1794-6638, null 5, Nº. 11, 2010, pags. 145-158
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
virtud
política ética sociedad individuo Virtue Politics Ethics Society individual |
| spellingShingle |
virtud
política ética sociedad individuo Virtue Politics Ethics Society individual Cadavid Guerrero, Iván Andrés Lo público o lo privado: Un presupuesto de virtud en Aristóteles |
| description |
One of the current themes of the whole of Aristotle’s political theory of the
public versus the private, from which can be classified as virtue or vice of a
government. But let it be understood, for Aristotle there can be good or bad policy, it does not become an ethics that determine. Thus, the issue of ethics
under which the ruler is the one who is determined to choose between public
and private, determines not only virtue but also the future of a political
community. But here comes the problem, as you might think that if the
individual is privileged society is neglected because contrario, if society is
privileged, neglected the individual, how to get around this problem?, This
and other similar questions are what is intended to address in this article.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Cadavid Guerrero, Iván Andrés
|
| author_facet |
Cadavid Guerrero, Iván Andrés
|
| author_sort |
Cadavid Guerrero, Iván Andrés
|
| title |
Lo público o lo privado: Un presupuesto de virtud en Aristóteles
|
| title_short |
Lo público o lo privado: Un presupuesto de virtud en Aristóteles
|
| title_full |
Lo público o lo privado: Un presupuesto de virtud en Aristóteles
|
| title_fullStr |
Lo público o lo privado: Un presupuesto de virtud en Aristóteles
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Lo público o lo privado: Un presupuesto de virtud en Aristóteles
|
| title_sort |
lo público o lo privado: un presupuesto de virtud en aristóteles
|
| publishDate |
2010
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6263281
|
| _version_ |
1773262122681106432
|