La guardia europea de fronteras y costas: ¿Un avance respecto a Frontex? Una valoración provisional
The serious migratory crisis that has affected the European Union and its Member States in recent years has highlighted the limitations of the FRONTEX Agency's actions to tackle it. The European Border and Coast Guard was established by Regulation 2016/1624; it replaces FRONTEX and gives contin...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6258201 |
| Source: | Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI), ISSN 1697-5197, Nº. 34, 2017 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001245199
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI), ISSN 1697-5197, Nº. 34, 2017
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Crisis migratoria
Espacio de Libertad Seguridad y Justicia FRONTEX Gestión de las fronteras externas Guardia Europea de Fronteras y Costas Migratory Crisis Area of freedom security and justice FRONTEX External Border Management European Border and Coast Guard |
| spellingShingle |
Crisis migratoria
Espacio de Libertad Seguridad y Justicia FRONTEX Gestión de las fronteras externas Guardia Europea de Fronteras y Costas Migratory Crisis Area of freedom security and justice FRONTEX External Border Management European Border and Coast Guard Soler García, Carolina La guardia europea de fronteras y costas: ¿Un avance respecto a Frontex? Una valoración provisional |
| description |
The serious migratory crisis that has affected the European Union and its Member States in recent years has highlighted the limitations of the FRONTEX Agency's actions to tackle it. The European Border and Coast Guard was established by Regulation 2016/1624; it replaces FRONTEX and gives continuity to all its operations. The present study is dedicated to the analysis of this new Agency of the European Union, taking as a reference the actions carried out by its predecessor, FRONTEX. As a positive aspect of the regulations governing the European Border and Coast Guard, it should be noted that it is planned the creation of a permanent rapid reaction pool; increased funding is provided; powers to organize return operations are conferred and an internal complaints mechanism is established. However, in a provisional assessment, these normative developments do not seem sufficient to solve all the limitations presented by FRONTEX in order to provide an effective response to the serious migratory crisis. Ultimately, it must always be taken into account that Member States are still largely responsible for managing their external borders.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Soler García, Carolina
|
| author_facet |
Soler García, Carolina
|
| author_sort |
Soler García, Carolina
|
| title |
La guardia europea de fronteras y costas: ¿Un avance respecto a Frontex? Una valoración provisional
|
| title_short |
La guardia europea de fronteras y costas: ¿Un avance respecto a Frontex? Una valoración provisional
|
| title_full |
La guardia europea de fronteras y costas: ¿Un avance respecto a Frontex? Una valoración provisional
|
| title_fullStr |
La guardia europea de fronteras y costas: ¿Un avance respecto a Frontex? Una valoración provisional
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
La guardia europea de fronteras y costas: ¿Un avance respecto a Frontex? Una valoración provisional
|
| title_sort |
la guardia europea de fronteras y costas: ¿un avance respecto a frontex? una valoración provisional
|
| publishDate |
2017
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6258201
|
| _version_ |
1772718538979540992
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012451992023-07-27La guardia europea de fronteras y costas: ¿Un avance respecto a Frontex? Una valoración provisionalSoler García, CarolinaCrisis migratoriaEspacio de LibertadSeguridad y JusticiaFRONTEXGestión de las fronteras externasGuardia Europea de Fronteras y CostasMigratory CrisisArea of freedomsecurity and justiceFRONTEXExternal Border ManagementEuropean Border and Coast GuardThe serious migratory crisis that has affected the European Union and its Member States in recent years has highlighted the limitations of the FRONTEX Agency's actions to tackle it. The European Border and Coast Guard was established by Regulation 2016/1624; it replaces FRONTEX and gives continuity to all its operations. The present study is dedicated to the analysis of this new Agency of the European Union, taking as a reference the actions carried out by its predecessor, FRONTEX. As a positive aspect of the regulations governing the European Border and Coast Guard, it should be noted that it is planned the creation of a permanent rapid reaction pool; increased funding is provided; powers to organize return operations are conferred and an internal complaints mechanism is established. However, in a provisional assessment, these normative developments do not seem sufficient to solve all the limitations presented by FRONTEX in order to provide an effective response to the serious migratory crisis. Ultimately, it must always be taken into account that Member States are still largely responsible for managing their external borders.La grave crisis migratoria que ha afectado a la Unión Europea y sus Estados miembros en los últimos años, ha puesto en evidencia las limitaciones que presentan las actuaciones de la Agencia FRONTEX para hacerle frente. Con la adopción del Reglamento 2016/1624, se crea la Guardia Europea de Fronteras y Costas, que sustituye a FRONTEX y da continuidad a todas sus operaciones. El presente estudio está dedicado al análisis de esta nueva Agencia de la Unión Europea, tomando siempre como referente las actuaciones llevadas a cabo por su antecesora, FRONTEX. Como aspectos positivos que presenta la normativa que regula la Guardia Europea de Fronteras y Costas, cabe destacar que se prevé la creación de un contingente de reacción rápida permanente; se contempla una mayor financiación; se le atribuye competencias para organizar operaciones de retorno y se establece un mecanismo interno de denuncias. No obstante, en una valoración provisional, estos desarrollos normativos no parecen suficientes para resolver todas las limitaciones que presentaba FRONTEX con el objetivo de ofrecer una respuesta efectiva a la grave crisis migratoria. En última instancia, siempre se debe de tener en cuenta que, en gran medida, los Estados miembros siguen siendo los principales responsables de gestionar sus fronteras externas.2017text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6258201(Revista) ISSN 1697-5197Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI), ISSN 1697-5197, Nº. 34, 2017spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|