El alcance del concepto de "hecho de la circulación" y la cobertura del seguro obligatorio, según la doctrina el TJUE: Su colisión con el derecho interno español
The Judgment of the Court of Justice of 4 September 2001 interprets, in a homogeneous way, what must be understood as a fact of circulation and, therefore, the scope of compulsory motor vehicle liability insurance coverage in the EU. The interpretation made by the CJEU implies the de fact considerat...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6238423 |
Source: | Revista de la Asociación Española de Abogados Especializados en Responsabilidad Civil y Seguro, ISSN 1887-7001, Nº. 62, 2017, pags. 33-48 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
Summary: |
The Judgment of the Court of Justice of 4 September 2001 interprets, in a homogeneous way,
what must be understood as a fact of circulation and, therefore, the scope of compulsory motor
vehicle liability insurance coverage in the EU.
The interpretation made by the CJEU implies the de fact consideration of the movement, covered
by compulsory insurance, the use of a vehicle according to its usual function.
This interpretation conflicts with the content of articles 2.1 and 2.2 of the Regulation of Compulsory
Insurance of civil liability in the circulation of Spanish motor vehicles.
The conclusion of this work proposes the modification of the aforementioned legal precepts,
in order to accommodate the interpretation of the CJEU that extends the scope of coverage of
compulsory insurance of motor vehicles, which contemplates Spanish. |
---|