Tra metodo e merito: Osservazioni a margine del (fallito) processo riformatore della XVII legislatura dell’Italia repubblicana
The article reconstructs some delicate issues related to the attempt of constitutional reform that has occurred in Italy during the current legislature. Considering the rejection of the project, the author will highlight some aspects that are mainly methodological but that also have repercussions on...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Italian |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6230602 |
| Source: | Revista d'estudis autonòmics i federals, ISSN 1886-2632, Nº. 26, 2017, pags. 86-129 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001241565
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Revista d'estudis autonòmics i federals, ISSN 1886-2632, Nº. 26, 2017, pags. 86-129
|
| language |
Italian
|
| topic |
costituzione
diritto costituzionale revisione costituzionale sistemi elettorali |
| spellingShingle |
costituzione
diritto costituzionale revisione costituzionale sistemi elettorali Ferraiuolo, Gennaro Tra metodo e merito: Osservazioni a margine del (fallito) processo riformatore della XVII legislatura dell’Italia repubblicana |
| description |
The article reconstructs some delicate issues related to the attempt of constitutional
reform that has occurred in Italy during the current legislature. Considering the rejection of
the project, the author will highlight some aspects that are mainly methodological but that also
have repercussions on the form of the institutions that the legislator has tried to affect. The
work is structured in three parts. In the first, the author reconstructs some critical aspects
of the framework in which the reform has been attempted, which has affected the way in
which the latter has been carried out. In the second, the paper discusses the overall sense of
the proposed actions, aimed at triggering a majority-personal dynamic in the framework
of the Italian parliamentary system (also through important changes in the electoral legislation). In the third, the work identifies the limits of the construction delineated, in the
light of the characteristics of the political context in which the same should have been
implemented, and recovering analytical insights from comparative experiences. The main
idea that emerges from the study is that the approach to the reforms adopted in Italy (today
as in the past) relies too much on regulatory automatisms aimed at governability, disregarding
the actions that should lead instead towards the development of the political culture of the
actors, making the representative dynamics more fluid.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Ferraiuolo, Gennaro
|
| author_facet |
Ferraiuolo, Gennaro
|
| author_sort |
Ferraiuolo, Gennaro
|
| title |
Tra metodo e merito: Osservazioni a margine del (fallito) processo riformatore della XVII legislatura dell’Italia repubblicana
|
| title_short |
Tra metodo e merito: Osservazioni a margine del (fallito) processo riformatore della XVII legislatura dell’Italia repubblicana
|
| title_full |
Tra metodo e merito: Osservazioni a margine del (fallito) processo riformatore della XVII legislatura dell’Italia repubblicana
|
| title_fullStr |
Tra metodo e merito: Osservazioni a margine del (fallito) processo riformatore della XVII legislatura dell’Italia repubblicana
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Tra metodo e merito: Osservazioni a margine del (fallito) processo riformatore della XVII legislatura dell’Italia repubblicana
|
| title_sort |
tra metodo e merito: osservazioni a margine del (fallito) processo riformatore della xvii legislatura dell’italia repubblicana
|
| publishDate |
2017
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6230602
|
| _version_ |
1756811362712944640
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012415652023-02-02Tra metodo e merito: Osservazioni a margine del (fallito) processo riformatore della XVII legislatura dell’Italia repubblicanaFerraiuolo, Gennarocostituzionediritto costituzionalerevisione costituzionalesistemi elettoraliThe article reconstructs some delicate issues related to the attempt of constitutional reform that has occurred in Italy during the current legislature. Considering the rejection of the project, the author will highlight some aspects that are mainly methodological but that also have repercussions on the form of the institutions that the legislator has tried to affect. The work is structured in three parts. In the first, the author reconstructs some critical aspects of the framework in which the reform has been attempted, which has affected the way in which the latter has been carried out. In the second, the paper discusses the overall sense of the proposed actions, aimed at triggering a majority-personal dynamic in the framework of the Italian parliamentary system (also through important changes in the electoral legislation). In the third, the work identifies the limits of the construction delineated, in the light of the characteristics of the political context in which the same should have been implemented, and recovering analytical insights from comparative experiences. The main idea that emerges from the study is that the approach to the reforms adopted in Italy (today as in the past) relies too much on regulatory automatisms aimed at governability, disregarding the actions that should lead instead towards the development of the political culture of the actors, making the representative dynamics more fluid.L’articolo ricostruisce alcune questioni problematiche sottese al tentativo di revisione costituzionale prodottosi in Italia nella legislatura in corso. Tenuto conto della bocciatura del progetto in sede referendaria, saranno evidenziati profili di interesse principalmente metodologico, non privi però di riflessi sulla conformazione assunta dagli istituti su cui il legislatore ha provato ad incidere. Il lavoro è strutturato in tre parti. Nella prima ricostruite alcune criticità del quadro in cui ha preso forma il disegno riformatore, che ha inciso sulle modalità con cui quest’ultimo è stato portato avanti. Nella seconda si illustra il senso complessivo degli interventi proposti, diretti a innescare, negli assetti del parlamentarismo italiano, una dinamica spiccatamente maggioritario-personalistica (anche attraverso importanti modifiche della legislazione elettorale). Nella terza, si individuano i limiti della costruzione delineata alla luce delle connotazioni del contesto politico in cui la stessa avrebbe dovuto trovare attuazione, recuperando spunti analitici dalla esperienza comparata. L’idea complessiva che emerge dallo studio è quella per cui l’approccio alle riforme adottato in Italia (oggi come in passato) faccia eccessivo affidamento su automatismi normativi tesi alla governabilità, trascurando gli interventi che dovrebbero favorire una maturazione della cultura politica degli attori istituzionali che rendano più fluide le dinamiche rappresentative.2017text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6230602(Revista) ISSN 1886-2632Revista d'estudis autonòmics i federals, ISSN 1886-2632, Nº. 26, 2017, pags. 86-129itaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|