Juízes ou experts? Uma comparação acerca das construções jurídicas de verdades em casos difíceis
The paper discusses the argument that experts are better decision-makers in cases that involve scientific knowledge in relation to judges. This is a debate about the allocation of decision in complex society. The study underscores the examination of administrative courts in Brazil, as well as a comp...
Saved in:
Main Author: | de Barros, Marco Antonio Loschiavo Leme |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6182134 |
Source: | Revista Electrónica Direito e Sociedade - REDES, ISSN 2318-8081, Vol. 5, Nº. 2, 2017, pags. 157-174 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
Similar Items
-
Aplicación del proceso jerárquico de análisis en la selección de la lozalización de una PYME
by: Martínez Rodríguez, Elena
Published: (2007) -
The judicial assessment of expert evidence in Polish criminal procedure
by: Solodov, Denis
Published: (2023) -
El aspecto científico de la trilogía “ministerio público- policía-peritos” en el nuevo proceso penal de corte acusatorio, adversarial y oral en México
by: Maruri Jiménez, Juan Antonio
Published: (2015) -
Toma de decisiones en Instituciones de Educación Superior en la Amazonia: hacia una síntesis de racionalidades
by: Pont Vidal, Josep, et al.
Published: (2016) -
An introduction to AI and criminal justice in Europe
by: Quattrocolo, Serena
Published: (2019)