Conversão da ação individual em ação coletiva: análise do conteúdo do artigo 333 do CPC/2015, das razões do veto da presidente da república e do aproveitamento do instituto no atual sistema processual
This study aims to spread the collective process as an instrument to the improvement of jurisdictional assistance and implementation of the constitutional principles of the Brazilian procedural law, corollaries of collective due process, on the basis of the analysis of conversion from individual in...
Gorde:
| Egile Nagusiak: | , |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Portugalera |
| Argitaratua: |
2017
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6120952 |
| Baliabidea: | Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 13, Nº. 2, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista Brasileira de Direito. Mai-Ago/2017), pags. 389-409 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
This study aims to spread the collective process as an instrument to the improvement of
jurisdictional assistance and implementation of the constitutional principles of the Brazilian
procedural law, corollaries of collective due process, on the basis of the analysis of conversion from individual in collective action, presents originally on article 333 of Civil Procedure Code of 2015, which was vetoed by the Presidency of the republic. Therefore, the analytical method of decomposition institute is used to better analyze each specificity. As the institute was regulated, the conversion from individual in collective action would bring great achievements to qualitative justice enforcement. Accordingly, there is inconsistency in Presidency’s veto, considering the institute wasn’t weak disciplined and there was the need for harmonious coexistence of rights collective protection techniques with individual techniques of collective repercussion on Brazilian civil procedure system. |
|---|