Causas del control judicial a los actos administrativos disciplinarios proferidos por las procuradurías regionales de Tolima y de Cundinamarca
The Jurisdicción de lo Contencioso Administrativo (Administrative ContentiousJurisdiction or Judicial Jurisdiction) can exercise control over punitive administrativeactions issued by Attorney General’s Office, its regional commissions or other agentsthrough a means of control called annulment and ri...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6132868 |
| Source: | Via Inveniendi et Iudicandi, ISSN 1909-0528, Vol. 10, Nº. 1, 2015, pags. 153-179 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
The Jurisdicción de lo Contencioso Administrativo (Administrative ContentiousJurisdiction or Judicial Jurisdiction) can exercise control over punitive administrativeactions issued by Attorney General’s Office, its regional commissions or other agentsthrough a means of control called annulment and right restoration. However, thisprocedural instrument is not always effectively used because there is a lack of knowledgeregarding how to invoke properly causes for annulment of the act that motivates its judicialexercise. This lack of legal capacity may lead the disciplined to fail achieving a favorablecourt decision. To help solve this problem, a literature review and an investigation ofthe descriptive and interpretative were made. In this study, disciplinary sanctions issuedby regional attorneys of Tolima and Cundinamarca were analyzed qualitatively andquantitatively. Specifically, this investigation examined the causes for conducting a judicialreview of disciplinary actions emanated from these two regional attorney’s offices. Theresults of these investigative efforts are presented in this article. |
|---|