Diseño estratégico en la incorporación del sistema de justicia penal acusatorio en México.

Abstract: This study builds a strategic design model adversarial justice under the signs of theoretical frameworks and construction of new paradigms to strengthen international human rights policy under the principles of due process of law.The experiences that the Mexican state has developed since 2...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Montero Zendejas, Daniel
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6119879
Source:Revista de Derecho: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Católica de Uruguay, ISSN 1510-3714, Nº. 10, 2014 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista de Derecho), pags. 93-154
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Summary: Abstract: This study builds a strategic design model adversarial justice under the signs of theoretical frameworks and construction of new paradigms to strengthen international human rights policy under the principles of due process of law.The experiences that the Mexican state has developed since 2008, traffic in adversarial and inquisitorial model to deal with different variables in addition to its legislation on constitutional matters, trial guarantees, restorative justice; as well as the incorporation of international treaties into its positive law; confronts new         manifes tations that globalization has made macrocriminality and a culture, often corrupt, simulation, opacity and impunity, experiences, all of them, analyzed in light of Criminal Science to provide legal mechanisms and whose utility is considered and placed on the table of theoretical discussion and, where appropriate, legislative effect to be incorporated into the new criminal legislation of the Republic of Uruguay. The autonomy of the prosecution, combating the so-called tax havens, the fight against organized crime since the Palermo Convention, innovation mechanisms such forfeiture by the state to absorb the profits or illegal proceeds seeking legalized through corruptand elastic taxation rules for “the laundering of” practices.