Formalismo o antiformalismo en el contencioso administrativo.
Abstract: Our contentious administrative cancellation was conceived based on the reviewer dogma, of French origin. That, coupled with the prevailing legal philosophy in the era in which it was implemented and political requirements of the time, led to the adoption of a strict formalism with regards...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6119877 |
Source: | Revista de Derecho: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Católica de Uruguay, ISSN 1510-3714, Nº. 10, 2014 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista de Derecho), pags. 59-91 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001219539
|
---|---|
record_format |
dialnet
|
spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012195392017-10-03Formalismo o antiformalismo en el contencioso administrativo.Durán Martínez, Augustocontentious administrativeformalismantiformalismright to effective judicial protectionaccess to the processactive legitimization: Uruguaycontencioso administrativoformalismoantiformalismoderecho a la tutela judicial efectivaacceso al procesolegitimación activaagotamiento de la vía administrativaplazo de caducidad para accionarUruguayAbstract: Our contentious administrative cancellation was conceived based on the reviewer dogma, of French origin. That, coupled with the prevailing legal philosophy in the era in which it was implemented and political requirements of the time, led to the adoption of a strict formalism with regards to access to the process, both as regards theactive legitimation, as to the requirement of prior exhaustion of administrative remedies as well as regards the fixing of time limits for revocation to operate. With the neoconstitucionalismo varied vision of the law. The perspective of the legal system from the human rights, which is now imposed in the case, since the right to effective judicial protection, leads to question all those ceremonials for the benefit of access to the process.Resumen: Nuestro contencioso administrativo de anulación fue concebido en base al dogma revisor, de origen francés. Eso, unido a la filosofía jurídica imperante en la época en que se implantó y a exigencias políticas propias del momento, llevó a la adopción de un estricto formalismo en lo que refiere al acceso al proceso, tanto en lo relativo a la legitimación activa, como a la exigencia del previo agotamiento de la vía administrativa, así como en cuanto a la fijación de plazos de caducidad para accionar. Con el neoconstitucionalismo varió la visión del derecho. La perspectiva del ordenamiento jurídico desde los derechos humanos, que ahora se impone en el caso, desde el derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva, lleva a cuestionar todos esos ritualismos en beneficio del acceso al proceso.2014text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6119877(Revista) ISSN 1510-3714Revista de Derecho: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Católica de Uruguay, ISSN 1510-3714, Nº. 10, 2014 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista de Derecho), pags. 59-91spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|
institution |
Dialnet
|
collection |
Dialnet AR
|
source |
Revista de Derecho: Publicación de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Católica de Uruguay, ISSN 1510-3714, Nº. 10, 2014 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista de Derecho), pags. 59-91
|
language |
Spanish
|
topic |
contentious administrative
formalism antiformalism right to effective judicial protection access to the process active legitimization: Uruguay contencioso administrativo formalismo antiformalismo derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva acceso al proceso legitimación activa agotamiento de la vía administrativa plazo de caducidad para accionar Uruguay |
spellingShingle |
contentious administrative
formalism antiformalism right to effective judicial protection access to the process active legitimization: Uruguay contencioso administrativo formalismo antiformalismo derecho a la tutela judicial efectiva acceso al proceso legitimación activa agotamiento de la vía administrativa plazo de caducidad para accionar Uruguay Durán Martínez, Augusto Formalismo o antiformalismo en el contencioso administrativo. |
description |
Abstract: Our contentious administrative cancellation was conceived based on the reviewer dogma, of French origin. That, coupled with the prevailing legal philosophy in the era in which it was implemented and political requirements of the time, led to the adoption of a strict formalism with regards to access to the process, both as regards theactive legitimation, as to the requirement of prior exhaustion of administrative remedies as well as regards the fixing of time limits for revocation to operate. With the neoconstitucionalismo varied vision of the law. The perspective of the legal system from the human rights, which is now imposed in the case, since the right to effective judicial protection, leads to question all those ceremonials for the benefit of access to the process.
|
format |
Article
|
author |
Durán Martínez, Augusto
|
author_facet |
Durán Martínez, Augusto
|
author_sort |
Durán Martínez, Augusto
|
title |
Formalismo o antiformalismo en el contencioso administrativo.
|
title_short |
Formalismo o antiformalismo en el contencioso administrativo.
|
title_full |
Formalismo o antiformalismo en el contencioso administrativo.
|
title_fullStr |
Formalismo o antiformalismo en el contencioso administrativo.
|
title_full_unstemmed |
Formalismo o antiformalismo en el contencioso administrativo.
|
title_sort |
formalismo o antiformalismo en el contencioso administrativo.
|
publishDate |
2014
|
url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6119877
|
_version_ |
1709746245222793216
|