Matrimonio homosexual en Colombia: Discriminación, vacíos legales y alternativas jurídicas
Objective: To determine whether same-sex couples who have had the option to establish a family, have been affected by the rejection of who gives an marriage and the failure of Congress on comprehensive regulation. Methodology: This paper reviews the arguments of the Public Hearing of 30 July 2015 of...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6101304 |
| Source: | Ambiente Jurídico, ISSN 0123-9465, Nº. 19, 2016, pags. 127-162 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001216481
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Ambiente Jurídico, ISSN 0123-9465, Nº. 19, 2016, pags. 127-162
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Derecho público
Palabras clave: matrimonio del mismo sexo LGBTI relaciones del mismo sexo parejas del mismo sexo derecho de familia gay marriage LGBTI same-sex couples family law casamento entre homossexuais LGBTI casais do mesmo sexo direito de família |
| spellingShingle |
Derecho público
Palabras clave: matrimonio del mismo sexo LGBTI relaciones del mismo sexo parejas del mismo sexo derecho de familia gay marriage LGBTI same-sex couples family law casamento entre homossexuais LGBTI casais do mesmo sexo direito de família Villarreal Márquez, Melissa Matrimonio homosexual en Colombia: Discriminación, vacíos legales y alternativas jurídicas |
| description |
Objective: To determine whether same-sex couples who have had the option
to establish a family, have been affected by the rejection of who gives an
marriage and the failure of Congress on comprehensive regulation. Methodology:
This paper reviews the arguments of the Public Hearing of 30 July
2015 of the Constitutional Court, the bodies responsible for the regulation
of equal marriage, the published literature concerning the subject and Colombian
law. Results: Although the literature on the subject is reduced, it is
possible to observe a lack of regulation about equal marriage in Colombia and
consequent discrimination. Also, do not generally understood authorized in
the operative part of the judgment C-577 of 2011 that qualifies as an unnamed
contract and atypical contractual relationship, and therefore does not generate
state protections, but a lack of protection to spouses and direct injury to State.
Conclusions: Congress should consider including the institution of marriage,
or another with the same guarantees in order to achieve a greater degree of
equality, democracy and freedom, to help consolidate the social and democratic
rule of law
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Villarreal Márquez, Melissa
|
| author_facet |
Villarreal Márquez, Melissa
|
| author_sort |
Villarreal Márquez, Melissa
|
| title |
Matrimonio homosexual en Colombia: Discriminación, vacíos legales y alternativas jurídicas
|
| title_short |
Matrimonio homosexual en Colombia: Discriminación, vacíos legales y alternativas jurídicas
|
| title_full |
Matrimonio homosexual en Colombia: Discriminación, vacíos legales y alternativas jurídicas
|
| title_fullStr |
Matrimonio homosexual en Colombia: Discriminación, vacíos legales y alternativas jurídicas
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Matrimonio homosexual en Colombia: Discriminación, vacíos legales y alternativas jurídicas
|
| title_sort |
matrimonio homosexual en colombia: discriminación, vacíos legales y alternativas jurídicas
|
| publishDate |
2016
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6101304
|
| _version_ |
1740171652540399616
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00012164812022-08-02Matrimonio homosexual en Colombia: Discriminación, vacíos legales y alternativas jurídicasVillarreal Márquez, MelissaDerecho públicoPalabras clave: matrimonio del mismo sexoLGBTIrelaciones del mismo sexoparejas del mismo sexoderecho de familiagay marriageLGBTIsame-sex couplesfamily lawcasamento entre homossexuaisLGBTIcasais do mesmo sexodireito de famíliaObjective: To determine whether same-sex couples who have had the option to establish a family, have been affected by the rejection of who gives an marriage and the failure of Congress on comprehensive regulation. Methodology: This paper reviews the arguments of the Public Hearing of 30 July 2015 of the Constitutional Court, the bodies responsible for the regulation of equal marriage, the published literature concerning the subject and Colombian law. Results: Although the literature on the subject is reduced, it is possible to observe a lack of regulation about equal marriage in Colombia and consequent discrimination. Also, do not generally understood authorized in the operative part of the judgment C-577 of 2011 that qualifies as an unnamed contract and atypical contractual relationship, and therefore does not generate state protections, but a lack of protection to spouses and direct injury to State. Conclusions: Congress should consider including the institution of marriage, or another with the same guarantees in order to achieve a greater degree of equality, democracy and freedom, to help consolidate the social and democratic rule of lawObjetivo: determinar se os casais do mesmo sexo que tiveram a opção de estabelecer uma família, foram afetados pela rejeição de quem dá um casamento eo fracasso do Congresso na regulamentação abrangente. Metodologia: Este artigo analisa os argumentos da audiência pública de 30 de julho de 2015 do Tribunal Constitucional, os órgãos responsáveis pela regulação da igualdade de casamento, a literatura publicada sobre a lei assunto e colombiana. Resultados: Embora a literatura sobre o assunto é reduzida, é possível observar uma falta de regulamentação sobre a igualdade de casamento na Colômbia e consequente discriminação. Além disso, não geralmente entendida autorizada na parte decisória do acórdão C-577 de 2011, que qualifica como contrato sem nome e relação contratual atípico, e, portanto, não gera proteção do Estado, mas a falta de proteção aos cônjuges e lesão direta estado. Conclusões: Congresso deve considerar incluindo a instituição do casamento, ou de outra com as mesmas garantias a fim de alcançar um maior grau de igualdade, democracia e liberdade, para ajudar a consolidar o Estado social e democrático de direito.Objetivo: determinar si las parejas del mismo sexo que han tenido la opción de constituir una familia, se han visto afectadas por el rechazo de que contraigan un vínculo matrimonial y la omisión del Congreso respecto a una regulación integral. Metodología: este trabajo revisa los argumentos de la Audiencia Pública del 30 de julio de 2015 de la Corte Constitucional, los órganos competentes para la regulación del matrimonio igualitario, la literatura publicada referente al tema y la legislación colombiana. Resultados: Aunque la literatura sobre el tema es reducida, es posible observar una falta de regulación acerca del matrimonio igualitario en Colombia y su consecuente discriminación. Además, no suele entenderse el vínculo contractual autorizado en la parte resolutoria de la sentencia C- 577 de 2011 que lo califica como un contrato innominado y atípico, por lo cual no genera protecciones estatales, sino una desprotección a los contrayentes y una lesión directa al Estado. Conclusiones: el Congreso debe considerar la inclusión de la institución del matrimonio, u otra con las mismas garantías, con el fin de alcanzar un mayor grado de igualdad, democracia y libertad, que ayude a consolidar el Estado Social y democrático de Derecho.2016text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=6101304(Revista) ISSN 0123-9465Ambiente Jurídico, ISSN 0123-9465, Nº. 19, 2016, pags. 127-162spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|