Uma visão crítica do soberano: sobre a herança moderna, a lógica atual de soberania e o exercício democrático / A critique sight of sovereignty: about modern heritage exercise, sovereignty logic nowadays and democratic exercise
This essay consists on the analysis of sovereignty nowadays, given the legacy from modern theories and intensification of exercised sovereignty in recent political scene. Is taken in consideration power relations which drown the prevalent conception of sovereignty in democratic constitutionalism as...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5899556 |
| Source: | Revista Brasileira de Direito, ISSN 2238-0604, Vol. 13, Nº. 1, 2017 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Revista Brasileira de Direito. Jan-Abr/2017), pags. 106-130 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
This essay consists on the analysis of sovereignty nowadays, given the legacy from modern theories and intensification of exercised sovereignty in recent political scene. Is taken in consideration power relations which drown the prevalent conception of sovereignty in democratic constitutionalism as in the world system global order. According to the hypothesis proposed remains present the project of modernity and western expansion linked with the exercise of sovereignty. Research was carried out about the heritage of the concept sovereignty, related with the formation of international order and democratic constitutionalism as considered according to domination of the Third World by Europe and political dimension today. The theoretical bias comes from deconstruction thought by Jacques Derrida followed by critical reflection professed by Costa Douzinas. So it was necessary to think beyond the institutional boundaries of sovereign proliferation of nation-states and international law in the pursuit of alternative able to push the boundaries of modern drive and inhibit the proliferation of international society under the universal harbinger. On the other hand, however, it observed the exercise of resistance opposite to legitimized violence of law, which implies the continuous (re) definition of democratic space. So it is investigated the possibility of displacement of sovereign through democratic mobilization. |
|---|