Suplemento alimenticio y protección de los derechos de los consumidores: comentarios sobre el caso ADN
This papers comments a sentence about product liability,whose misclassification affected the consumer’s rights to securityand health. It deals at first with the possible application of theConsumer Law to matters regulated by special rules, and its relationwith the non bis in idem principle. After th...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5853790 |
Source: | Ars Boni et Aequi, ISSN 0719-2568, Vol. 10, Nº. 1, 2014, pags. 225-245 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
Summary: |
This papers comments a sentence about product liability,whose misclassification affected the consumer’s rights to securityand health. It deals at first with the possible application of theConsumer Law to matters regulated by special rules, and its relationwith the non bis in idem principle. After that, deals with the labellingof the product as ‘defective’, and the liability that could ascribed tothe seller due to its conduct. Finally, it refers to the moment whenprescription begins in these matters. |
---|