Dilemas sobre la relación entre derecho y moral: A propósito de la Sentencia C-404 de 1998, de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia

The relation between law and morals is a constant debate in jurisprudence. Usually the issue is considered from the case of unjust norms. Few studies deal with the case of legal rules that only pursues moral purposes. The aim of this document is to study this relation, based on the debate presented...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: López Sterup, Henrik
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: 2016
Subjects:
law
Online Access:https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5677962
Source:Derecho Público, ISSN 1909-7778, Nº. 36, 2016
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
id
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001045699
record_format
dialnet
institution
Dialnet
collection
Dialnet AR
source
Derecho Público, ISSN 1909-7778, Nº. 36, 2016
language
Spanish
topic
moral
derecho
relación moral y derecho
incesto
constitucionalismo
positivismo
argumentación jurídica
Morals
law
relation between law and morals
constitutionalism
incest
positivism
legal argumentation
moral
direito
relação moral e direito
incesto
constitucionalismo
positivismo
argumentação jurídica
spellingShingle
moral
derecho
relación moral y derecho
incesto
constitucionalismo
positivismo
argumentación jurídica
Morals
law
relation between law and morals
constitutionalism
incest
positivism
legal argumentation
moral
direito
relação moral e direito
incesto
constitucionalismo
positivismo
argumentação jurídica
López Sterup, Henrik
Dilemas sobre la relación entre derecho y moral: A propósito de la Sentencia C-404 de 1998, de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia
description
The relation between law and morals is a constant debate in jurisprudence. Usually the issue is considered from the case of unjust norms. Few studies deal with the case of legal rules that only pursues moral purposes. The aim of this document is to study this relation, based on the debate presented in the Colombian Constitutional Court Decision C-404/98. The study will show the difficulties the constitutional judge encounter when she justifies the compatibility between moral rules and the constitutional standards, as well to advance in alternatives to the solutions given by the Court. At the end, it’s shown how the Court abandons legal analysis in order to validate the moral rule. The study is based on legal argumentation analysis and conceptual reflection
format
Article
author
López Sterup, Henrik
author_facet
López Sterup, Henrik
author_sort
López Sterup, Henrik
title
Dilemas sobre la relación entre derecho y moral: A propósito de la Sentencia C-404 de 1998, de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia
title_short
Dilemas sobre la relación entre derecho y moral: A propósito de la Sentencia C-404 de 1998, de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia
title_full
Dilemas sobre la relación entre derecho y moral: A propósito de la Sentencia C-404 de 1998, de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia
title_fullStr
Dilemas sobre la relación entre derecho y moral: A propósito de la Sentencia C-404 de 1998, de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia
title_full_unstemmed
Dilemas sobre la relación entre derecho y moral: A propósito de la Sentencia C-404 de 1998, de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia
title_sort
dilemas sobre la relación entre derecho y moral: a propósito de la sentencia c-404 de 1998, de la corte constitucional de colombia
publishDate
2016
url
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5677962
_version_
1709744685159809024
spelling
dialnet-ar-18-ART00010456992019-02-26Dilemas sobre la relación entre derecho y moral: A propósito de la Sentencia C-404 de 1998, de la Corte Constitucional de ColombiaLópez Sterup, Henrikmoralderechorelación moral y derechoincestoconstitucionalismopositivismoargumentación jurídicaMoralslawrelation between law and moralsconstitutionalismincestpositivismlegal argumentationmoraldireitorelação moral e direitoincestoconstitucionalismopositivismoargumentação jurídicaThe relation between law and morals is a constant debate in jurisprudence. Usually the issue is considered from the case of unjust norms. Few studies deal with the case of legal rules that only pursues moral purposes. The aim of this document is to study this relation, based on the debate presented in the Colombian Constitutional Court Decision C-404/98. The study will show the difficulties the constitutional judge encounter when she justifies the compatibility between moral rules and the constitutional standards, as well to advance in alternatives to the solutions given by the Court. At the end, it’s shown how the Court abandons legal analysis in order to validate the moral rule. The study is based on legal argumentation analysis and conceptual reflectionA relação entre direito e moral é um debate constante na teoria do direito. Usualmente se considera a questão das normas jurídicas injustas. Poucas vezes se estuda esta relação a partir de normas jurídicas que unicamente perseguem fins morais. O objetivo deste documento é o estudo de dita relação, com ocasião do debate que se deu no caso da Sentença C-404 de 1998 da Corte Constitucional da Colômbia. Busca-se mostrar as dificuldades às que se enfrenta o juiz constitucional ao justificar a compatibilidade de regras morais com a Constituição e, também, avançar alternativas ante as soluções propostas pela Corte. Se demostra que o juiz constitucional termina por incorporar a regra moral sem submetê-la a uma análise jurídica. A metodologia parte da análise da argumentação e a reflexão conceitualLa relación entre derecho y moral es un debate constante en la teoría del derecho. Usualmente se considera la cuestión de las normas jurídicas injustas. Pocas veces se estudia esta relación a partir de normas jurídicas que únicamente persiguen fines morales. El objetivo de este documento es el estudio de dicha relación, con ocasión del debate que se dio en el caso de la Sentencia C-404 de 1998 de la Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Se busca mostrar las dificultades a las que se enfrenta el juez constitucional al justificar la compatibilidad de reglas morales con la Constitución y, a la vez, avanzar alternativas ante las soluciones propuestas por la Corte. Se demuestra que el juez constitucional termina por incorporar la regla moral sin someterla a un análisis jurídico. La metodología parte del análisis de la argumentación y la reflexión conceptual2016text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5677962(Revista) ISSN 1909-7778Derecho Público, ISSN 1909-7778, Nº. 36, 2016spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI