La realidad de la obligación alimentaria

dialnet-ar-18-ART0001035970

dialnet

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

Inciso, ISSN 1794-1598, Vol. 15, Nº. 1, 2013, pags. 263-274

Spanish

Alimentante
alimentario
bienestar
familia
obligación alimentaria
Food obligation
family
bringer
fee
be good

Alimentante
alimentario
bienestar
familia
obligación alimentaria
Food obligation
family
bringer
fee
be good
Narváez Osorio, Ángela María
La realidad de la obligación alimentaria

This article presents the results of the research accomplished through the Post Graduate Studies in Pedagogy and University teaching at Universidad la Gran Colombia Armenia headquarters, with the purpose to evaluate the effectiveness of the article 130 of the Law 1098, given in 2006 in respect to the rating of the food share in relation to the 24 article same Law which determines the amount established for the purpose. Food share has become an important source of income for the families in Colombia, therefore, the Law generated one way to set the amount (make it real) ruling its rate and the procedure to make this quota an obligation providing an executive merit for its application; however, it is disturbing that some parents are providing ridiculous amounts for their children support not even covering 10% of their basic needs. The findings are that in some cases the quota does not reach the laughable amount of $10,000 every month. In the same way it is noticeable to find that the common of people understand as food share the amount of money provided by the father and that it should be enough for food, being this a clear deviation of the philosophy of the article 24 of the 1098 Law, given in 2006 which conceives the food share not only as the fact of providing food, but to provide as well education, health, recreation, clothing, housing among others. The present article demonstrates that the amounts paid, make the article 130 same Law in regard to the rating of the food share completely ineffective whenever the expression “to the amount…” can be interpreted as that the quota may range between 1% to 50% of the parent income as it is completely clear that the actual paid quota is only used for food and even though it´s not enough.

Article

Narváez Osorio, Ángela María

Narváez Osorio, Ángela María

Narváez Osorio, Ángela María

La realidad de la obligación alimentaria

La realidad de la obligación alimentaria

La realidad de la obligación alimentaria

La realidad de la obligación alimentaria

La realidad de la obligación alimentaria

la realidad de la obligación alimentaria

2013

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5657616

1709744618799628288

dialnet-ar-18-ART00010359702016-10-08La realidad de la obligación alimentariaNarváez Osorio, Ángela MaríaAlimentantealimentariobienestarfamiliaobligación alimentariaFood obligationfamilybringerfeebe goodThis article presents the results of the research accomplished through the Post Graduate Studies in Pedagogy and University teaching at Universidad la Gran Colombia Armenia headquarters, with the purpose to evaluate the effectiveness of the article 130 of the Law 1098, given in 2006 in respect to the rating of the food share in relation to the 24 article same Law which determines the amount established for the purpose. Food share has become an important source of income for the families in Colombia, therefore, the Law generated one way to set the amount (make it real) ruling its rate and the procedure to make this quota an obligation providing an executive merit for its application; however, it is disturbing that some parents are providing ridiculous amounts for their children support not even covering 10% of their basic needs. The findings are that in some cases the quota does not reach the laughable amount of $10,000 every month. In the same way it is noticeable to find that the common of people understand as food share the amount of money provided by the father and that it should be enough for food, being this a clear deviation of the philosophy of the article 24 of the 1098 Law, given in 2006 which conceives the food share not only as the fact of providing food, but to provide as well education, health, recreation, clothing, housing among others. The present article demonstrates that the amounts paid, make the article 130 same Law in regard to the rating of the food share completely ineffective whenever the expression “to the amount…” can be interpreted as that the quota may range between 1% to 50% of the parent income as it is completely clear that the actual paid quota is only used for food and even though it´s not enough.Este artículo es resultado del proyecto de investigación realizado en la Especialización en Pedagogía y Docencia Universitaria de la Universidad La Gran Colombia, con el fin de evaluar la efectividad del artículo 130 de la Ley 1098 de 2006 respecto de la tasación de la cuota alimentaria, en relación con el artículo 24 de la misma ley que determina lo que abarca dicha cuantía. La obligación alimentaria se ha convertido en Colombia en una fuente de ingresos muy importante para las  familias, por lo tanto la ley generó una forma para fijarla (hacerla realidad), reglamentando desde su tasación hasta el procedimiento para lograr que esta cuota sea una obligación que preste merito ejecutivo; no obstante, es preocupante encontrar  padres y madres aportando sumas irrisorias a sus hijos con las cuales no se cubre ni el 10% de la necesidad básica de los niños, niñas y adolescentes, hallando que se pagan cuotas inclusive desde diez mil pesos ($10.000) mensuales. Igualmente llama la atención encontrar que las personas del común entienden por cuota alimentaria el valor aportado por el padre de sus hijos y que debe alcanzar para suministrar comida, siendo esta una clara muestra de la desviación filosófica del objetivo del artículo 24 de la Ley 1098 de 2006, que concibe por obligación alimentaria no solo el hecho de aportar alimentos, sino también salud, educación, recreación, vestido, vivienda, entre otros. El presente artículo logra demostrar que las sumas pagadas hacen que la forma en la que está redactado el artículo 130 de la Ley 1098 de 2006 que se refiere a la tasación de la cuota alimentaria es completamente ineficiente al permitir la expresión “hasta” con lo cual una cuota puede oscilar entre el 1% al 50% de los ingresos de un alimentante, así como  queda completamente claro que la cuota que actualmente se paga solo se utiliza en comida y aun así no es suficiente para este fin.2013text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5657616(Revista) ISSN 2346-0792(Revista) ISSN 1794-1598Inciso, ISSN 1794-1598, Vol. 15, Nº. 1, 2013, pags. 263-274spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI