Socialismo o comunismo diferencias entre John Stuart Mill y Karl Marx
Today the concepts of socialism and communism are handled as synonyms, which should not be. Karl Marx understood the transition from capitalism to socialism to communism and socialism as the product of historical development. That is, as the result of the development of productive forces in society...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5657578 |
| Source: | Inciso, ISSN 1794-1598, Vol. 17, Nº. 2, 2015, pags. 93-113 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0001035932
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Inciso, ISSN 1794-1598, Vol. 17, Nº. 2, 2015, pags. 93-113
|
| language |
Spanish
|
| topic |
Comunismo
derechos políticos y civiles revolución socialismo solidaridad Socialism Communism Revolutions Solidarity Political and civil rights |
| spellingShingle |
Comunismo
derechos políticos y civiles revolución socialismo solidaridad Socialism Communism Revolutions Solidarity Political and civil rights Muñoz Cardona, Ángel Emilio Socialismo o comunismo diferencias entre John Stuart Mill y Karl Marx |
| description |
Today the concepts of socialism and communism are handled as synonyms, which should not be. Karl Marx understood the transition from capitalism to socialism to communism and socialism as the product of historical development. That is, as the result of the development of productive forces in society that are gradually changing the social relations of production. Thought that can largely agree with the approach of John Stuart Mill as a result of dialogue and political consensus and parliamentary democratic result of universal education in social sympathies or civil consciousness. But Marxists wanted to get to communism through the violence of the revolution of mass men “the emancipation of the working class must be the work of the working class itself” (Marx and Engels 1975, p.13). The process has involved the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat, ideological fanaticism, not result of political consensus or social transformation as a product of the history of development of the means of production. Clarifies the historical difference of these theoretical and ideological approaches from philosophy milleana is the task to develop in this essay.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Muñoz Cardona, Ángel Emilio
|
| author_facet |
Muñoz Cardona, Ángel Emilio
|
| author_sort |
Muñoz Cardona, Ángel Emilio
|
| title |
Socialismo o comunismo diferencias entre John Stuart Mill y Karl Marx
|
| title_short |
Socialismo o comunismo diferencias entre John Stuart Mill y Karl Marx
|
| title_full |
Socialismo o comunismo diferencias entre John Stuart Mill y Karl Marx
|
| title_fullStr |
Socialismo o comunismo diferencias entre John Stuart Mill y Karl Marx
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Socialismo o comunismo diferencias entre John Stuart Mill y Karl Marx
|
| title_sort |
socialismo o comunismo diferencias entre john stuart mill y karl marx
|
| publishDate |
2015
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5657578
|
| _version_ |
1709744605776314368
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00010359322021-06-16Socialismo o comunismo diferencias entre John Stuart Mill y Karl MarxMuñoz Cardona, Ángel EmilioComunismoderechos políticos y civilesrevoluciónsocialismosolidaridadSocialismCommunismRevolutionsSolidarityPolitical and civil rightsToday the concepts of socialism and communism are handled as synonyms, which should not be. Karl Marx understood the transition from capitalism to socialism to communism and socialism as the product of historical development. That is, as the result of the development of productive forces in society that are gradually changing the social relations of production. Thought that can largely agree with the approach of John Stuart Mill as a result of dialogue and political consensus and parliamentary democratic result of universal education in social sympathies or civil consciousness. But Marxists wanted to get to communism through the violence of the revolution of mass men “the emancipation of the working class must be the work of the working class itself” (Marx and Engels 1975, p.13). The process has involved the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat, ideological fanaticism, not result of political consensus or social transformation as a product of the history of development of the means of production. Clarifies the historical difference of these theoretical and ideological approaches from philosophy milleana is the task to develop in this essay.Actualmente los conceptos de socialismo y de comunismo se manejan como sinónimos, cosa que no debería ser. Karl Marx entendía el paso del capitalismo al socialismo y del socialismo al comunismo como producto del devenir histórico, es decir, como el resultado del desarrollo de las fuerzas productivas dentro de la sociedad que van alterando poco a poco las relaciones sociales de producción. Pensamiento que en gran medida puede concordar con el planteamiento de John Stuart Mill como resultado de diálogos y de consensos políticos democráticos y parlamentarios fruto de la educación generalizada en los sentimientos de simpatía social o de la conciencia civil. Pero los marxistas quisieron llegar al comunismo por medio de la violencia, es decir, de la revolución de los hombres masa, por lo que afirma: “La emancipación de la clase obrera debe ser obra de la clase obrera misma” (Marx y Engels, 1975:13). Proceso que ha significado la implantación de la dictadura del proletariado, del fanatismo ideológico; no fruto del consenso político o de la transformación social como producto de la historia del desarrollo de los medios de producción. Dar claridad a la diferencia histórica de dichos planteamientos teóricos e ideológicos a partir de la filosofía milleana es la tarea a desarrollar en el presente artículo 2015text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5657578(Revista) ISSN 2346-0792(Revista) ISSN 1794-1598Inciso, ISSN 1794-1598, Vol. 17, Nº. 2, 2015, pags. 93-113spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|