¿Inconstitucionalidad en abstracto o en concreto?

dialnet-ar-18-ART0001027168

dialnet

dialnet-ar-18-ART00010271682016-09-21¿Inconstitucionalidad en abstracto o en concreto?Rodríguez Grez, PabloTribunal Constitucionalcontrol concretocontrol abstractoConstitutional Courtconcrete judicial reviewabstract judicial reviewThe purpose of this article is to precise the power of the Constitutional Court in reviewing the as-applied action of unconstitutionality (recurso de inaplicabilidad) in judicial review of statutory rules. If the Court resolves the cases using an abstract review (only comparing the legal statutory rule with the constitutional norms), then its powers would be reduced. On the contrary, if the judicial review action is considered as a concrete (as applied) examination, the Court’s powers would be increased in a way that the same legal rule can be considered as adjusting the Constitution in some cases, and contradicting constitutional norms in others, depending on judicial interpretation. Since this question must be addressed in the preliminary admissibility examination, and that the concrete review model gives the Constitutional Court powers that belong to non-constitutional ordinary judges, it must be concluded that constitutional justices should only review the statutory rules using an abstract examinationEl presente artículo tiene por objeto precisar cuál es la competencia del Tribunal Constitucional para conocer del recurso de inaplicabilidad. Si se estableciera que a este corresponde resolver en abstracto, el ámbito de sus atribuciones se reduciría considerablemente, limitándose a contrastar el precepto legal objetado con las normas constitucionales. A la inversa, si dicha apreciación debe hacerse en concreto, se amplían las referidas atribuciones a tal extremo que un mismo precepto legal puede ajustarse en ciertos casos a la Carta Fundamental y en otros contradecirla, dependiendo de la interpretación que en uno y otro caso se acuerde. Habida consideración, entre otras razones, de que la cuestión debe resolverse en la fase de admisibilidad y que admitir una apreciación en concreto implicaría asignar al Tribunal Constitucional facultades hermenéuticas propias de los jueces del fondo, debe concluirse que a los jueces constitucionales está confiado un control normativo que supone siempre una apreciación en abstracto2013text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5638994(Revista) ISSN 0719-2959Revista Derecho Público Iberoamericano, ISSN 0719-2959, Nº. 2, 2013, pags. 15-33spaLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

Revista Derecho Público Iberoamericano, ISSN 0719-2959, Nº. 2, 2013, pags. 15-33

Spanish

Tribunal Constitucional
control concreto
control abstracto
Constitutional Court
concrete judicial review
abstract judicial review

Tribunal Constitucional
control concreto
control abstracto
Constitutional Court
concrete judicial review
abstract judicial review
Rodríguez Grez, Pablo
¿Inconstitucionalidad en abstracto o en concreto?

The purpose of this article is to precise the power of the Constitutional Court in reviewing the as-applied action of unconstitutionality (recurso de inaplicabilidad) in judicial review of statutory rules. If the Court resolves the cases using an abstract review (only comparing the legal statutory rule with the constitutional norms), then its powers would be reduced. On the contrary, if the judicial review action is considered as a concrete (as applied) examination, the Court’s powers would be increased in a way that the same legal rule can be considered as adjusting the Constitution in some cases, and contradicting constitutional norms in others, depending on judicial interpretation. Since this question must be addressed in the preliminary admissibility examination, and that the concrete review model gives the Constitutional Court powers that belong to non-constitutional ordinary judges, it must be concluded that constitutional justices should only review the statutory rules using an abstract examination

Article

Rodríguez Grez, Pablo

Rodríguez Grez, Pablo

Rodríguez Grez, Pablo

¿Inconstitucionalidad en abstracto o en concreto?

¿Inconstitucionalidad en abstracto o en concreto?

¿Inconstitucionalidad en abstracto o en concreto?

¿Inconstitucionalidad en abstracto o en concreto?

¿Inconstitucionalidad en abstracto o en concreto?

¿inconstitucionalidad en abstracto o en concreto?

2013

https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=5638994

1709744561341857792